Comment There is much truth in this sarcastic reply (Score 1) 266
techsoldaten is on the right track. Stone is hard to beat for longevity and resistance to damage. Hieroglyphics are sufficiently decipherable to allow scientists to decode them from scratch. Any serious millenial-class storage would need to take these features into consideration. Remember: If all you care about is longevity - to quote Dr. Strangelove out of context - "there's no limit to the size!" Nobody said it would be cheap; but take a look at what it costs to house, maintain and restore ancient artworks. techsoldaten has it right.
If you want your art to be recoverable (in some form) 5,000 years from now, you need to make assumptions about not only the temporal journey and potential hazards therein; but also the nature and technical sophistication of the society that is likely to attempt to recover it. The fewer incorrect assumptions, the more likely it will be recovered.
I find this topic fascinating, on many levels. It's all the more fascinating because even serious archivists can't seem to get beyond the next 100 years or so before their preservation schemes break down.