1516dcl - Slashdot User

Sky Watchers Want Recognized a Newly Described Type of Cloud 166

Posted by timothy on Sunday October 11, 2009 @02:36AM from the but-armageddon-is-a-place dept.

phantomfive writes "In Iowa and Scotland there are reports of a type of cloud not yet recognized by the World Meteorological Foundation. It seems the cloud does not match any of the clouds in the International Cloud Atlas, and thus there is a campaign underway to have it included. Some have said the clouds look like Armageddon has arrived."

Who Owns Application Delivery Meta-Data In the Cloud? 67

Posted by timothy on Sunday February 08, 2009 @05:00AM from the semi-esoteric dept.

Random Feature writes "The Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum (CCIF) is currently discussing cloud portability specifications. It seems crazy to define a standard before we even know who owns what in the cloud because you can only port what you own. For example, if you created a security or acceleration policy for your cloud computing-based app, is the policy yours or the provider's? Who owns meta-data in the cloud?" True portability between clouds seems to hang on the answer.

Comment Re:Ironic. (Score 1) 350

by 1516dcl on Wednesday May 21, 2003 @10:27PM (#6012751) Attached to: Caldera vs. Microsoft Court Documents To Be Shredded

And why didn't you provide a link to any page which links OSDN to "Murberry?" You claim that you found these links using lexis-nexis because you know that most people don't have a (very expensive) subscription to that database. Nice try. Anyone with an educational/legal subscription to lexis-nexis: Please do a quick search and refute this guy's claim completely.

For what it's worth, a Lexis-Nexis search for Murberry in the last two years returns No documents were found for your search.

Not all solutions have problems.

Slashdot Top Deals