Comment Re:Fixed storage cost (Score 1) 103
Yes - you are right - I've fixed that now. Though it didn't alter the overall conclusions but an embarrassing mistake none the less!
Submission + - Memory versus disk and cpu - how the balance has changed in 35 years (wordpress.com)
Submission + - Chromium Being Ported to VC++, Compiler Bugs Fixed
Submission + - White House issues veto threat as House prepares to vote on EPA 'secret science' (sciencemag.org)
Submission + - Study: Refactoring Doesn't Improve Code Quality (itworld.com)
Submission + - Use astrology to save Britain's health system says MP (theguardian.com)
Submission + - David Cameron says Brits should be taught Imperial measures (wordpress.com)
Submission + - It's Time To Bring Pseudoscience into the Science Classroom
According to Schmaltz and Lilienfeld, there are 7 clear signs that show something to be pseudoscientific: 1. The use of psychobabble – words that sound scientific and professional but are used incorrectly, or in a misleading manner. 2. A substantial reliance on anecdotal evidence. 3. Extraordinary claims in the absence of extraordinary evidence. 4. Claims which cannot be proven false. 5. Claims that counter established scientific fact. 6. Absence of adequate peer review. 7. Claims that are repeated despite being refuted. Schmaltz and Lilienfeld recommend incorporating examples of pseudoscience into lectures and contrasting them with legitimate, groundbreaking scientific findings. For example, professors can expound upon psychics and the tricks they use to fool people or use resources such as the Penn & Teller program "Bullshit".
But teachers need to be careful or their worthy efforts to instill critical thinking could backfire. Prior research has shown that repeating myths on public fliers, even with the intention of dispelling them, can actually perpetuate misinformation. “The goal of using pseudoscientific examples is to create skeptical, not cynical, thinkers. As skeptical thinkers, students should be urged to remain open-minded,” say Schmaltz and Lilienfeld. "By directly addressing and then refuting non-scientific claims, science educators can dispel pseudoscience (PDF) and promote scientific skepticism, while avoiding the unhealthy extremes of either uncritical acceptance or cynicism."
Submission + - Scottish independence campaign battles over BBC Weather forecast (wordpress.com)
Submission + - Read better books to be a better person (wordpress.com) 1
Submission + - Newest YouTube user to fight a takedown is copyright guru Lawrence Lessig (arstechnica.com)
Submission + - English High Court bans scientific paper (wordpress.com)
Comment Re:That is the worst article I ever red (Score 1) 349
Who said it was meant to be journalism? It's my blog on computing. I write what I like. If you don't like it you can get your money back when you leave. If you want journalism then you shouldn't start from here.
Comment Re:That is the worst article I ever red (Score 1) 349
Sorry you didn't like the article. I have written a few other pieces on UC on the blog and maybe they make it clearer (or maybe not! De gustibus non est disputandum).
For background in late 2010 the DWP announced at an Institute of Government seminar in Whitehall (that I attended) that they would use "agile" to deliver UC. The seminar was a real Emperor's New Clothes affair as lots of small development companies were in the room and they all thought/hoped they'd get a chunk of the action - nobody (including me - I was just a lowly computer science MSc student) dared to say what seemed obvious to me - that this was a massive mission criticial project that it was a mistake to use an experimental (for the government) development methodology on to meet a political - as opposed to evidence - defined timetable on.
My gripe is not with agile per se - strip away the corporate hoopla and it seems to make a lot of sense to me. My fear is that "agile" was seized upon by politicians who know nothing about software development as a way of solving their problems and defining themselves positively against the previous Labour government (declaration of interest: I worked in a political role for that government).