Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Let it die. (Score 1) 554

Yes, but how much is your time worth? Would you be willing to pay for a streaming service that provides interesting selections from the entire body of music ever produced with complete customizable options delivered to any device you own 24/7/365 on demand?

This has its appeal, and its place, although target devices are limited for bandwidth and quality. I often listen to the cable-tv-provided theme channels and pipe it through the audio rack. There are several non customizable channels that occasionally get use, mostly the holiday themed ones. I've used Rhapsody frequently in the past. I've used amazon to just buy mp3s.

There is something to be said for music as a service, even though people can copy the stream, which makes it easier to hear anything at anytime for a reasonable flat periodic fee.

It's not a huge time investment to format shift a stream for my own use in my truck, on another pc, or another cd/dvd player. It wasn't even that much of an addition money investment. That's really the key benefit, which is seemingly outside the lines as far as the RIAA is concerned. They don't want to sell a service, they want to sell per spin, or at least per device.

but many people would rather pay a couple bucks per month to have someone else do that for them and deliver it to them as a nicely packaged service

I don't consider myself an audiophile, but I do have nice gear, and don't mind "turning the dials" on it. I don't think locally stored music is any different than managing albums, cassettes, or CDs before we could copy to different disks.

I would use a service if the cost was really a "few bucks a month", if that price included bandwidth, the quality wasn't dirt, was commercial free and I could customize the inbound playlist. That would replace the need for me to format shift in large part, and then it wouldn't be worth my time to bother.

Comment Re:Let it die. (Score 1) 554

It's not distribution, its ownership of the copyright and the ability to charge $$ for it. The distribution issue is pointless because (as I understand it) the commercial reproduction for profit is where the copyright laws were intended to protect against and "sharing among friends" for free was not protected. Distribution may have brought us all to the point of redefining "friends", but only so we can be charged.

Its clearly a losing battle though. If it hits my audio gear or pc, it's MINE.

Comment Maybe ... (Score 1) 63

Infosec has jumped the shark.

- There are too many nitwits in the community. So much money has been wasted on the posers.
- Premium capital for "the best protection" (which is still vulnerable) vs. moderate capitol and common sense (which is still vulnerable). The latter wins in this economy.
- Don't play the TJX card, either... their stock went up, their customers numbers have risen; no one cares about that breach (or no one cares thats been LOUD enough). If the bottom line wasn't really affected that much over that breach and exposure, its simple to understand why bean-counters moderate infosec purchases in the name of profit.
- the biggest problem is the users. And nothing infosec does will stop stupid people from being stupid.

Its difficult to counter the above perceptions, regardless if the perception is right or wrong. I don't think it will get much easier to counter those perceptions.

Comment Re:And they wonder why..... (Score 1) 299

What kind of collector would buy any GM car made after the mid 1970s?

There is probably collector interest for almost any year 'vette, but I think you are right in that after the '74 big block or '75 convertible, there isn't much else. I am not a fan of the anniversary editions, or those stupid pace car editions. What about the 80's Hurst olds 442 or the Buick Gran Sport? Maybe there is niche collectors for those and some of the other "performance" upgraded -- late model impala SS, Monte Carlo SS, etc..

I would rather drive it, than L@@K at it, myself.

Comment Re:Bad news all around (Score 1) 427

but it seems to me that providing for one's widow and/or children is one of the things that an author would likely be concerned about, and probably even consider to be a "need".

Hows life insurance for satisfying that need? Or does that not create enough income for the little freeloaders? [sarcasm intended]

Comment Re:Awesome! (Score 1) 164

Probably they should. I have never seen one single credible justification for over 1 second boot time for any desktop operating system.

I don't think the eventual target is desktops.

From TFA:

For industrial automation and other similar applications, fast boot and response time is critical to successful operation. Applications must be fully operational at power on and cannot be delayed due to the volatile nature of the platform and environment. Variables such as power fluctuation, network failure, device availability, and memory management must be responded to with no loss of performance and functionality. These same demanding requirements are found not just in Industrial Automation applications, but automotive, aerospace, and military applications as well.

I can see other reasons for linux based kernel devices like web/net appliances, game consoles, cell phones, etc... to have really low boot times.

Slashdot Top Deals

Were there fewer fools, knaves would starve. - Anonymous

Working...