There are actually people out there who believe Yelp reviews? That astonishes me.
They actually can be helpful for restaurants. Even the negative reviews can be helpful. Especially helpful are the ones with photos and a description of what they ordered. If you're going to post photos with no description and it's not possible to identify the dish because it could be one of many different things that look similar, that is useless. But you'll see some reviews that will say something like a group of 4 people ordered 4 different things and here are the photos with a description and 3 of the dishes were great and 1 was so-so, that can be really helpful. Sometimes people just like to complain and the unhinged reviews can be useful in that you can immediately discount those as they aren't legitimate criticisms. If somebody posts that the food was great but it took forever for it to arrive, that can be useful to know.
More cops doesn't matter when the DA won't prosecute
I don't live in California, but this does indeed seem to be a very real problem there.
and juries won't convict.
You lost me on this one. I don't believe that. I've served twice in juries and it left me really jaded about the US legal system. Nobody who believes in the righteousness of the US legal system should see what actually goes on in jury rooms and the kind of deal making that gets done to get 12 people to agree to a verdict. But I seriously doubt that juries are simply refusing to convict people when rock solid evidence is presented of a crime. Convictions don't happen when the prosecutors fail at their job. I can tell you that prosecutors overcharge all the time in the hope that some of the charges will stick and the best and brightest of lawyers don't work for them.
If you read further
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.... You must be new here. That's not how things work here.
Exactly this! The whole concept of hiding everything, while apparently not suddenly gaining the abilities of the aliens for almost 70 years by now is simply not credible.
Along those lines, the fact that Donald Trump was president is my best argument that the US government has no UFO information. Let me explain.
Sometime towards the end of Obama's 2nd term as president, some kid asked him about UFOs and aliens. Obama told the boy that he couldn't comment on the subject but he could tell him that as the president of the USA, he was in a position to have the information on whether aliens exist. This was more than any other president ever said.
Then we had Trump as president. Either somehow the entire government and military kept the information away from Trump about aliens (assuming that they do exist) or they told him nothing because there is nothing to tell. The latter is most likely. If Trump was ever told about aliens and that they do exist, no way would he keep that secret. He'd be building a spaceport and demanding that all alien spacecraft use his spaceport when coming to earth. So the fact that Trump hasn't done that or said anything about the subject means that there's nothing to tell because no way would he be able to keep it secret.
If this doesn't serve as a wake-up call about the climate crisis, I don't know what will.
In the USA, nothing will because everything is political. Approximately 40% of the US voters will always vote Republican. Approximately 40% will always vote Democratic. The Republican voters are in general more deeply religious and more susceptible to being told what to think. So Republican leaders say that climate change is a myth and there is a sort of expectation that it can't destroy the world because that would prevent Jesus from coming back again, so God/Jesus will intervene to prevent the world from being destroyed. Scott Adams isn't particularly religious but he is definitely conservative and he says that if it gets bad enough, we'll just whip up some new tech to fix all the problems (although that hasn't happened yet and may never happen). To be honest, people who try to get climate change skeptics to change their mind do so in the dumbest ways possible, like pushing a teenage girl in Sweden as an full fledged "expert" voice on climate matters. And the more unhinged and desperate the climate change warners get to try to get the other side to pay attention, the more they are actually driving them away. I gave up a long time ago on climate change stuff ever getting fixed because even if, let's say, the entire USA somehow believes it's real and even the Republican voters are fully supporting steps to limit climate change damage, nobody at all can ever stop Brazil, India, Russia and China from polluting because it's in their best economic interests to do so. So if climate change is real and devastating, we're doomed.
IBM had been achieving a doubling every 12 months. This announcement portends instead a doubling every 18 months going forward.
I assume this is true, but they just got to 433 Qbits and that's actually not very useful. The current state of quantum computing is kind of like building a teleportation device out of the movie "The Fly" and it's various sequels, not something like out of Star Trek. And you've reached the point where you can send an electronic signal from one device to the other, the signal is just a signal and it's not anything close to being the data needed to transport even an insect.
Some physicists thought that even getting over 400 Qbits would be impossible, so maybe they really can go further. But to reach 100,000 they need massive breakthroughs that haven't happened yet. I don't believe they could possibly string together even 10,000 Qbits on current technology. This is why some people say "Quantum winter is coming", which means that all this research is just a black hole to pour money down and they'll never, ever develop any kind of useful working computer. Know what the current speed record holder problem is for a quantum computer? It found the factors of 21, which are 3 and 7. And they had to cheat to do that by writing a program that could only factor the number 21. I get the desire to see if this can ever become something because the winner wins big time if it ever becomes useful, but the odds that it will never become useful are higher than the researchers want to admit.
Our universities have had a cozy relationship with China for too long. The US has over 300k foreign Chinese students currently. Why do we even allow this? What benefits does educating the elite children of our biggest adversary bring? For every slot they take, an American doesn't get a seat at a competitive university.
As someone who has actually been to China, I can tell you that in the vast majority of cases it makes the Chinese students have a completely different outlook on China - and not a good one, either. The problem is that until the leadership of the so-called People's Liberation Army realizes that dying to protect being slaves to the Communist Party isn't in their best interests, these students can't accomplish anything good by going back. I'm friends with a couple who are currently on H1-B visas and I think were US educated and they want to stay here forever. They are so afraid about going back that they didn't even return when each of them had a parent to die in recent years. A lot of these students are really smart so they do help make us better.
China wants it because they hate freedom
More US wank. China wants it because it was Chinese territory that it inherited from the fall of the Qing and the Republican government, and was then stolen by Japan in a genocidal war. Stupid yanks got to stop eating their own dogshit.
Russian troll much? Or maybe you're Dutch. The dumbest shit ever here seems to be posted by people from those 2 places.
Just so you know, the Chinese Communist Party has not for one day ever controlled Taiwan. Ever. So the idea that it "belongs" to them is straight up not true. Yes everybody who says that China only wants it to destroy its democracy is correct.
Came here to say this. A few lawyers are about to find out they should have paid more attention in lawschool. Charging different platforms different prices is a practice as old as time, and is also why you should never use internet explorer to book airline tickets.
You can't possibly be a lawyer and say that because if you actually are a lawyer, you've got to be absolutely awful at the job.
I'm not a lawyer either, but I bet almost anything I know more about the law than you do. I have tons of friends who are lawyers. I ask them questions about stuff exactly like this. Look, in the USA you can indeed sue over anything. You get the right jury, you win. It is very arguably discriminatory to charge different price to users of different technology. The laws are definitely vague enough to make a case about this.
What really proves her character is having two kids basically during her trial. That's pure, cold-blooded narcissism. Whether the babes were a ploy for sympathy, or this would be her only chance - either way, it's all about her, her, her.
It's some of both. Her official reason is the latter one. She said she wanted to have 5 kids and she's running out of time. But clearly there is a desire for sympathy here too as she keeps getting pregnant and then asking for delays because she is pregnant. My guess is she is trying desperately to get pregnant again while this current delay in her reporting to prison happens and if she does get pregnant, she'll try to use it as an excuse to not report. At this point I think she honestly thinks if she delays reporting long enough, one of her appeals will work and overturn the verdict.
It's a shame that the Russian forces missed out on the excellent HBO series 'Chernobyl', about an incident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, in Chernobyl. I mean, surely they've heard of it?
When we had reports last year of Russian troops actually dying from what they had done in Chernobyl, this question was asked. And the answer was that the Russian government doesn't allow Chernobyl to be taught in schools because it makes the Soviet Union, and by extension Russia as they actually ran the Soviet Union, look bad. So apparently Russian kids grow up never hearing about this.
I can personally testify that Ukrainians definitely know about Chernobyl. I went to Ukraine multiple times in the 2000s and the subject came up some in my travels there.
Sounds like HP didn't do their due diligence and have buyers remorse...
Correct. I don't know how to find it, but at the time we had a big, informative article on what went down. I'm working from memory here so I can't promise everything is 100% correct, but I'll do my best.
HP's CEO at the time became convinced that this acquisition was key to making HP a global player, so he put a lot of pressure on management and the board to approve the purchase with minimal investigation into Autonomy. Some stock market analyst had a lot of concerns about the numbers Autonomy was reporting prior to the sale and investigated and found out that they were for sure cooking the books. The analyst wrote an article on it and it spread like wildfire. I'm not sure of the exact sequence of events, but I think the article came out shortly before the purchase went through and the CEO of HP refused to let this derail the purchase. Sometime after the purchase went through, HP realized that they were had and Autonomy wasn't worth anything close to what they paid for it and the sales numbers Autonomy reported were greatly inflated. Autonomy's CEO has always said he's innocent, but it sure seems like there was fraud going on.
Money is the root of all evil, and man needs roots.