You seem to be under the misapprehension that the OP said "Male nurses and educators more prone to misconduct." Check yourself.

All I can think while scrolling through this trainwreck is, "oh. this thread again."

Come on, Slashdot, let's hear ALL OVER AGAIN about how a particular demographic has myriad unfair advantages over others, and yet mysteriously, has not managed to leverage those advantages into a superior social or economic position. Do your worst.

Alternatively, women face a much greater burden to be taken seriously in their profession than men do, and less leeway leads to cleaner habits.

You've contradicted yourself, unless your point is that a human eye isn't part of a human.

Or, if the ASIO really needs the resources it says it needs, let them go to the Australian people with their hat in their hands and ask for volunteers to run an Aussie-Government 'network agent' on their Internet-connected PCs to help them catch child molesters and plane-bombers for the good of the homeland, and if appeals to patriotism don't do the trick, let them offer money, and we'll find out how much a person's Internet privacy sells for on the open market.

You mean, the summary? Agreed.

adeelarshad82 meant to write "designed specifically for high-end gaming", not "exclusively", given that it wasn't designed to actually exclude non-gaming functions. I can barely even parse "With the help of crowdsourcing endeavor of tapping into Razer's fanbase", which seems to express the same concept twice redundantly without a preposition, and God only knows where the hyphen in "0.8-inches thick" came from or what it was meant to express. Absent these other issues, it would perhaps be forgivable that he saw fit to specify "Windows 8 with Intel architecture" even though he's already told us what CPU options we have (which are both Intel architecture) but it's a mediocre conclusion to that trainwreck of a summary.

2/10, would not read again.

If you know what the stack frame of the software you're targeting looks like, you don't even have to try every n-bit string in the whole memory dump, you can just go straight to whatever memory offset the key's always stored at. It's not like TrueCrypt just puts the key at a random spot in the middle of some other program's RAM page.

Many of the "language processing" problems the OP describes are actually "cognition" problems. If Google is serious about algorithmically translating from "academic jargon to local slang", then they're looking at writing an AI which can in some sense understand what is being said.

I guess it's a good thing Kurzweil's on board.

Cool story, athlete.

I was expecting anything which is properly referred to as a "crack" which is what TFS called it.

A known-key attack is not a "crack", it's just a "decrypt."

I think this absolution would be symbolic and not-actually-doing-anything enough, given that the person in question is dead.

If pardons were issued for the Holocaust, it would not be issued on behalf of any individual German nor of the "current generation of Germans", it would be issued on behalf of the German government or the state itself, which is an institution that outlives individual people. Why should any individual German imagine that *Germany* apologizing incriminates them?

Or if they "pardoned" or "absolved" him/her of being a Jew, as in "you're not guilty of that crime after all". That's also a bit off.

There's no better home broadband router these days than pfSense on a Soekris.

So wait, are you suggesting that we fire enough bullets at the assailant that the transferred momentum would... accelerate him out of the room?

That's a bizarre self-defense strategy.

Relevant: http://what-if.xkcd.com/21/