This isn't true. X-Ray backscatter machines scanning a vehicle would actually send particles INTO the vehicle and then detect what came back. Dogs and IR readers are detecting something already emanating from the vehicle.

You are welcome to try! Please make sure you use some sort or open source or open source related data if you want to be successful. It also doesn't hurt if the app in question is interesting to a large chunk of readership (well, the mods at least). :)

Hose Track? I had to click the article to see that they meant Horse Track. LOL!

It's not a repost, The new info is the bra is now commercially available.

Good point, I see it's merits. Some clarification from the researchers in question would go far to clear up the vagueness. I'll be curious to see if the public will have access to the material from the "closed-door security conference".

Did you even read the article?! It's based on the fact the code does SPECIAL THINGS when it encounters specific information used in a nuclear plant. From the article: "It's looking for specific things in specific places in these PLC devices. And that would really mean that it's designed to look for a specific plant". I would consider that some decent evidence.

nautical miles maybe?

In many places in the USA, you CAN be fired for what you choose to do on your own time. You can be fired for just about anything. It's called At-will employment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment

This just in! People who don't like things, want other people to not like those things too!

What makes it illegal? I'm not trying to be contrary here, I'm seriously curious. Is it a different situation than MacOS and iPhones and the way apps are developed?

I can also navigate menus just fine using the D-Pad. An explanation of the specific deficiencies of the D-Pad that some users experience would help.

I do have mod points today, however I did not have any left prior to responding the first time. Modding people down for trollish comments is perfectly acceptable. Telling someone that their respectable and difficult job is "dubious" is really trollish. As for reason, I gave reason in my response. Evidence is not called for in this case; reason may suffice. If you do not believe that to be the case, give evidence yourself so I can see what kind you require to satisfy you.

o.O

Wait what? Since when is ethical hacking dubious?! If I had mod points, you would be modded as a troll. Also, there are very good reasons for ethical malware creation. These are the guys who do research for anti-virus and security firms, not released to the wild. Learning how to do it, so code will be available to STOP or prevent it. If Microsoft and other software companies don't have people at this conference, then they are losing a great opportunity to gain knowledge that can be used to prevent this stuff.

Partisan pundit sissy fight? No, this is somebody defending his research after somebody essentially lied to make him look bad and got press from it.