it's designed to foster group-think.
Bullshit, the group-think already exists, moderation mearely highlights it, that's it's fucking job! The higher the number you browse at the lower the resolution you have on slashdot's opinions. If you want to see what 'slashdot thinks' then browse at a high number, if you want to know what every troll and drunkard thinks, browse at -1. Unpopular posts are modded to hell because they are unpopular, not because they are wrong. Unpopular posts are often rated interesting if they're well written and there's is a grain of truth in them.
The comment system here is far from perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than any other site I've visited in the past decade, part of that is the moderation performed by those " unusually intelligent commenters", plus the fact that it's difficult for "unintelligent commeters" to spam the moderation system with phoney up/down votes. If you still think your being treated unfairly then reword your argument or better still perform a bit of self-skepticisim on your own ideas to work out why everone else thinks your post sucks.
The only real other steps would be for the FDA to bring in experts to verify the considered risks and possibly verify the testing, which starts to become unrealistic.
Yes, in many cases the only 'experts' are the people who wrote the code. All you can really do is minimise risks by erecting procedural walls and testers between the experts, the accountants, and the patients. Sure it slows things down, bumps up costs, and is still not 'failsafe'. But that's the price of working under the motto "first do no harm".
Aside from that, in most western nations if your software does kill or injure someone, your 'principle engineer' better be able to demonstrate due diligence such as adherence to government mandated standards, ie: adherence to the law. If not he will find himself charged with the local equivalent of "negligent homicide". Why do people think there was so much fuss over Y2K? Why would an insurer not cancel a public liability policy if the insured was not Y2K "compliant", who would the coroner hold responsible if there was an accident? Y2K was not a "beat up", it was proof that software engineers can and do act like real engineers when risks are identified.
To the rest of the world a software engineer that ignores mandated standards is just as criminally reckless as the (veteran) Italian train driver who recently crashed his passenger train into a concrete embankment because he took a bend at twice the posted speed.
The exception is, of course, companies that can afford to monitor comments
...and aim a small army of astroturfers and their sock-puppets at you.
Agree, but OTOH I've been a regular commenter on AGW stories for over a decade now and have outlasted every astroturfer thrown at me, the same basic facts and opinions that were regularly modded -1 troll/overrated are now regularly modded +5 informative/insightful. Having said that, I sincerely thank Slashdot for providing the forum, I have been following the subject since the early 80's and have leant a great deal about the subject (and human nature) from that decade long "conversation".
If it ran Android I'd buy it for the hardware specs it has... if only it had wifi!
If we had meat, we could make a sandwich, if we had bread...
"It said last night on Twitter that Samantha Lewthwaite, the ‘white widow’ of London 7/7 bomber Jermaine Lindsay, was ‘in their ranks’ and a ‘brave lady’."
Lewthwaite. The "other" David Headly.
Amazing that people fall for these CIA/Mossad stooge-games.
That is not a good thing.
Nor is it a bad thing since unpopular opinions are in general unpopular for good reason.. Groupthink exists with or without moderation, in fact if moderation fails to highlight the group's main opinion(s) then it has failed to do what it was designed to do. It's simple really, if you want to know what the group thinks then browse at +4/5, if you want to know what everyone thinks browse at -1.
Now if we look at your current +5 score, we can deduce that "groupthink==BadThing(TM)" is a popular opinion on Slashdot, not one that I hold myself but never the less it does represent a significant and popular "group thought".
Either way? Tastes like anus.
But they just can't kill the beast.
If you would know the value of money, go try to borrow some. -- Ben Franklin