The usual thing appealed to is diversity of thought, but they constantly ask for diversity of demographic, which are not the same thing in the slightest. Diversity of thought lets you look at a problem from a wide variety of angles, potentially identifying new solutions or problems that you would not have with a more homogeneous group. However, diversity of demographic is at best a very clumsy way to fake diversity of thought and unfortunately it is becoming all too common that it actually acts counter to diversity of thought as activists demand the removal of the infidels... I mean the wrong thinkers... I mean the problematic types... yes, yes that's the appropriate euphemism. Anyway they demand the removal of problematic types in the name of supporting demographic diversity, but that actually causes more homogeneity in the group thought wise.
What really gets me is that so many go on about diversity and equality at the same time, when these are opposing concepts. If you truly believe that different demographics bring different assets to the game as it were, then you cannot expect equal results for the various group, yet people constantly do. Likewise if you do get equal results without outside pressure to force such, you can be assured the group essentially homogeneous and not really diverse.
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.