Wasn't a better approach to building telescopes to have multiple smaller ones working in conjunction, spread out across acres of land (or more) ?
There are two factors that help a large telescope for astronomical observations, resolution and light gathering. Combining smaller scopes (through some process like interferometry) gets you better resolution. There's a limit to what you can do effectively, though and a lot of gear in between has to stay aligned properly to work it. My gut feel for the engineering of it says that the probability of something failing would go up with the square of the number of scopes. For the other factor, the light gathering power (the ability to observe and image dim objects) only comes with surface area to gather more light/photons, and that means larger diameter scopes/mirrors, even if it's multiple larger scopes.
"Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company." -- Mark Twain