Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Actually... (Score 0, Troll) 368

Nothing could be farther from his point than your misinterpretation of it. The reasons why I leave as an exercise for the reader of the article. In other words, someone other than you. One hint, you know the author's point is not going to be summed up in an easily tweetable soundbite when midway through one of the paragraphs leads with "BUT the analogy isn’t perfect."

Comment Re:Will anyone use Lion 'server'? (Score 1) 303

I have never used any Apple server, don't know anybody using them or having used them and I never even heard about them.

Ah yes, the opinion of an Anonymous idiot on the Internet. I should definitely trust that you are the end all and be all of experience on this matter, as I don't know anyone who knows you or knew you and I have never heard of you.

Comment Re:You Need to Think About the Two Outcomes ... (Score 4, Informative) 369

Jimmy Carter all but left us to the Soviets mercy and pretty much every one elses.

Bullshit. Some of us lived through the period. We were never "at the Soviets mercy." You are entitled to your own opinion about the man, but buddy you are not entitled to your own facts, particularly ones that can only be found on films from your last colonoscopy / ear exam. Must be nice to see one specialist for both, however.

Comment Re:Cut costs, sure. (Score 1) 352

The first three manned boosters in the American space program were not designed as man-rated initially: they were all IRBMs (Redstone) or ICBMs (Atlas, Titan) rebuilt to NASA's specifications. Hell, in the original Grumman concept for the SRB assisted Shuttle, the SRBs were not custom made: they were off the shelf Minuteman IIIs to save money. The Soviets similarly used military hardware for most of their early program.

Comment Re:If only (Score 1) 361

No one is suggesting that they (the people) have to take a pay cut

Bull. To keep their jobs they have to deliver the same margins, or the investors will punish them. That means that if they offer something that costs more for a lower price, jobs have to go and/or salaries have to go down. They aren't going to make it up in volume.

Landline internet providers struggle with this, and their cost of expansion to accommodate unlimited service is trivial compared to what a wireless carrier has to build out. Information may want to be free, but copper and silicon most assuredly don't. Basic economics, I'm afraid. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

Google

Submission + - Why is GMail still in beta? (esquire.com)

rebeccaruthbauman writes: "From Esquire Magazine's Web-Only Content:

Why Is Gmail Still in Beta?

The e-mail program has been out for more than three years — what's the holdup, Google?


One thousand, one hundred and sixty-eight days ago Google presented Gmail to the Internet universe, revealing a future where any e-mail could be searched and every e-mail could be saved.

A lot has happened since Gmail hit the public on April 1, 2004 — back then, the Olsen twins were still jailbait, the country still liked George W. Bush, and the Red Sox hadn't won a World Series since 1918. But of all the innumerable nips and tucks to Gmail since, one element of Google's Web-based e-mail service has yet to change — it's still in beta.

For the uninitiated, "beta" is programmer lingo for the testing phase and a caveat emptor of sorts, a tag slapped on potentially successful programs still carrying kinks. This, of course, provides a benefit for the software company, giving any interested user the chance to operate and provide feedback on the product — the chance, in PR-speak, to become a "co-developer." (More scientific types have another name for these users: lab rats. Even better: top-quality software testers obtained in bulk, at no cost. Millions of 'em.)

Gmail, now widely used and tested, has been available for more than three years. It's a success. The service should be all grown up, or certainly on the cusp of maturity. So why is Gmail still fumbling with the perceived adolescence of a "beta" flag? Why can't Gmail just let go?

To find out, read the rest of this story at:

http://www.esquire.com/the-side/opinion/gmail-0613 07"

Novell

Submission + - Hubert Mantel Returns to Novell

Krondor writes: "Hubert Mantel, SuSe Co-Founder, has confirmed in an interview with Data Manager Online that he has returned to employment with Novell. When asked why he left Novell to begin with, Hubert responded that he was 'burned out' and 'following unpleasant experiences with our investors needed some time off'. Slashdot had reported previously Hubert's departure from Novell approximately one year ago shortly following Novell's acquisition of SuSe and subsequent layoffs. Hubert also provides his opinions on the Novell-Microsoft Agreement, which he characterizes as 'a good thing'."
Data Storage

Submission + - Hans Reiser to sell his company

DVega writes: Due to increasing legal costs, murder suspect Hans Reiser, is seeking to sell his company. His lawyer William DuBois said he is running out of money to pay for his defense. And added "This is a unique opportunity for someone to buy the company for pennies on the dollar. We welcome all vultures." This is a good opportunity to own a filesystem and rename after your own.

Slashdot Top Deals

To program is to be.

Working...