Comment Re:As I and many others pointed out yesterday (Score 1) 539
The decision for this case was written in 2000, and I believe that the concept of digital media has significantly changed since then. One of the primary points made by the Judge was that making digital copies of music purchased on CD was not covered by fair use, and that the Record Company maintains the right to licence digital copies of their work. Fast-forwarding to 2011, most users of the service would be uploading digital copies of their music instead of 'copying' from CD. As long as the user has rights to a digital copy that can be transfered to several devices (e.g. DRM free digital copies), then I think the service should be legitimate. Amazon could probably protect itself with some terms of service language making that a condition of use.
The Legal Decision:
http://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/cjoyce/copyright/release10/UGM.html
The Legal Decision:
http://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/cjoyce/copyright/release10/UGM.html