Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Translation (Score 1) 946

You may consider that formal notification of my viewpoint. Your corporate legal team can explain to you why the fact you are now aware of my view is important to them.

Translation: Go see your corp lawyers. FYI, you're about to get spanked.

That may not work out for him as well as he hopes. Their lawyers are certainly aware of the verdict in Oracle v. Google, and may reply that since APIs aren't copyrightable, they don't need permission anyway.

Comment Re:How to (not) get people to use your OS... (Score 1) 946

And you think that the Linux Kernel people, standing up for their Legal RIGHTS ...

Except I'm not sure they have those rights. Copyright on the code, of course, but here we're talking about copyrighting the API. We've just seen a major case on the subject, and the preliminary results are that "This command structure is a system or method of operation under Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act and, therefore, cannot be copyrighted." Of course, that still needs to go through appeals, but it's about as solid a judgement as I've seen. It also matches the current state of the law in Europe.

Comment Re:You can probably thank "Orbit" for this... (Score 1) 157

Kickstarter is not buying a finished product, it is donating to get something hopefully created.

Except when it is. I'm a somewhat suspicious type, so the only projects I've funded are ones where the work has already been done, and they have a quote from a manufacturer in hand, but they don't have the funds to get it done. (In my case, it's been for print runs of books.) In those cases, which admittedly may be a minority, Kickstarter has just replaced the preorder mechanism they had in place prior. It's great for that, because you don't have to trust some random artist with your money and hope that if they don't raise enough for the print run they'll process refunds efficiently.

Comment Re:Capture is easy. Reuse is hard. (Score 1) 88

To retrofit a bird you have to switch out modules/circuit boards, replace solar arrays, refuel ACS tanks, etc., etc., etc.

Generally you wouldn't have to do all of those things, just the ones that have failed. For many birds, that just means they're out of fuel, and that's the easiest thing to retrofit: you don't refill the tanks, you just attach a new one with its own set of thrusters. That's still quite difficult, but definitely technically feasible. Whether it's economically feasible is another story, which is presumably what this project is meant to determine.

If it turns out to be practical, then I expect that future satellites will be designed to allow for proper servicing.

Comment Re:Tesla's Musem in Belgrade does this (Score 2) 123

The Griffith Observatory in LA has one of the few remaining Tesla-built Tesla coils, and they do a demonstration like that. They used to pass out fluorescent bulbs, but with the proliferation of personal electronics and (more importantly) implanted medical devices they've had to put it in a Faraday cage. They still have both fluorescent and neon lights in the cage so you can see how it works, though.

Comment Re:And NASA has made mistakes with this before... (Score 5, Interesting) 228

They do indeed have systems like that, if you're interested it's worth looking into how they dealt with the Sol 18 Anomaly on Spirit. Of particular note is the "Shutdown Dammit" command that they used to override everything else the rover was doing so it would stop wasting battery overnight.

Seeing as they were able to update the software on a device that wouldn't even finish booting, I imagine the procedures for doing it on a functioning device are pretty robust, even if they're still nailbiting.

Slashdot Top Deals

Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you can find a rock.

Working...