Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:The North Korean Army was defeated in 1950. (Score 1) 608

.. On top of that, right before the war they gave the North Koreans 70,000+ ethnic Korean soldiers from the Chinese People's Liberation Army, including two already-organized, experienced ethnic Korean divisions that had fought in the Chinese civil war. Kim Il Sung invaded the south only after Mao promised to send forces if the USA intervened ..

Agree that there was a large influx of korean troops returning to NK after the end of the chinese civil war, but these weren't members of the chinese PLA (which didn't exist at the time). Those troops formed the KVA (Korean Volunteer Army) that fought side by side with the CCP forces .. the chinese forces in the korean war called themselves the People's Volunteer Army in tribute to the KVA since they were reciprocating the help they got from the KVA.

Neither Stalin or Mao or Kim Il Sung actually anticipated the US to intervene going by the statements that the US had made and the lack of assistance to SK (military or economical). And while Mao did intervene quite strongly, he wasn't consulted in the lead up to the start of the war .. rather he was kept in the dark because Stalin didn't trust Mao. Later on Stalin egged Mao on to intervene, but that was after the war turned bad for NK.

Comment Re:Yow! (Score 1) 270

That must have been there a long time ago .. I can't say I ran into anything but clean air (as clean as you can expect in any city at least ;) ) when I was there last northern summer. Nowadays half the problem is that the winds tend to blow the polution in Beijing as well as sand from Inner Mongolia over korea.

The chinese unfortunately refuse to do anything about the polution, which affects places as far away as Los Angeles:

China’s problem has become the world’s problem. Sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides spewed by China’s coal-fired power plants fall as acid rain on Seoul, South Korea, and Tokyo. Much of the particulate pollution over Los Angeles originates in China, according to the Journal of Geophysical Research.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/world/asia/26china.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

so the only thing that can be done is for korean volunteers and goverment agencies have to take the initiative in reforestation efforts in Inner Mongolia to at least abate the sand

Seoul launches reforestation of China’s Inner Mongolia region by Joseph Yun Li-sun The city of Seoul signs a US$ 49 million tree-planting agreement to reforest the Kubuqi, the seventh biggest desert in the world. The goal is to block sand blown by spring storms towards the Korean Peninsula.

Seoul (AsiaNews) – The Seoul Metropolitan Government has decided to plant 72,000 trees in the Kubuqi Desert of Inner Mongolia, which is the source of severe sandstorms that sweep across Asia. The aim is to prevent the so-called "yellow dust", dense clouds of fine, dry soil particles kicked up by high-speed surface winds in intense storms that block ventilation and irrigation systems on the Korean Peninsula and create health problems for the population. The city signed the deal on Tuesday with Future Forest and the All China Youth Federation to plant 72,000 trees and will invest about W50 million (US$ 49 million) in the tree-planting project.

The plan calls for members of the All China Youth Federation, which is affiliated with the Communist Party of China, to plant trees in Inner Mongolia.

NGOs will provide technical leadership and logistical support to planters, who might have problems in creating small oases to guarantee the survival of the saplings.

The 72,000 trees include poplar and desert willow, the only trees capable of growing with shallow roots.

According to some studies by Seoul University, if the tree-planting project is completed as scheduled, a green ecosystem in the desert will come into being by the end of next year, and will be capable of stopping the sand when winds blow from the West.

The Kubuqi is located some 600 kilometres west of Beijing and is seventh largest desert in the world.

Covered in forests until the late 19th century, it lost its vegetation as a result of early industrial development and overpopulation.

The region is known to be the source of 40 per cent of the yellow dust, which affects the Korean Peninsula every spring.

The South Koreans decided to launch this initiative because dusty thunderstorms have worsened over the past decade.

Sand can provoke serious respiratory problems and affects especially vulnerable groups like children, women and the elderly.

It can also clog air conditioning, an essential service for South Koreans during hot humid summers.

http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=16776

Comment Why E.coli? (Score 1, Informative) 86

From wiki it seems that it's widely used for genetic experiments:

E. coli is frequently used as a model organism in microbiology studies. Cultivated strains (e.g. E. coli K12) are well-adapted to the laboratory environment, and, unlike wild type strains, have lost their ability to thrive in the intestine. Many lab strains lose their ability to form biofilms.[70][71] These features protect wild type strains from antibodies and other chemical attacks, but require a large expenditure of energy and material resources.

In 1946, Joshua Lederberg and Edward Tatum first described the phenomenon known as bacterial conjugation using E. coli as a model bacterium,[72] and it remains the primary model to study conjugation.[citation needed] E. coli was an integral part of the first experiments to understand phage genetics,[73] and early researchers, such as Seymour Benzer, used E. coli and phage T4 to understand the topography of gene structure.[74] Prior to Benzer's research, it was not known whether the gene was a linear structure, or if it had a branching pattern.

E. coli was one of the first organisms to have its genome sequenced; the complete genome of E. coli K12 was published by Science in 1997.[75]

The long-term evolution experiments using E. coli, begun by Richard Lenski in 1988, have allowed direct observation of major evolutionary shifts in the laboratory.[76] In this experiment, one population of E. coli unexpectedly evolved the ability to aerobically metabolize citrate. This capacity is extremely rare in E. coli. As the inability to grow aerobically is normally used as a diagnostic criterion with which to differentiate E. coli from other, closely related bacteria such as Salmonella, this innovation may mark a speciation event observed in the lab.

By combining nanotechnologies with landscape ecology complex habitat landscapes can be generated with details at the nanoscale.[77] On such synthetic ecosystems evolutionary experiments with E. coli have been performed in order to study the spatial biophysics of adaptation in an island biogeography on-chip.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escherichia_coli

but out of all bacteria that could use used why use one associated with human disease?

Comment APT? Why the need for a new acronym? (Score 1) 33

All the hype about APTs being some sort of new and fashionable attack method is puzzling. Ultimately the core is simply another form of malware, perhaps used for a slightly different purpose than the old-school script kiddie website defacing, but ultimately the same principles of security apply just as much to APT as they do to any other form of attack.

Or in other words:

The fact is this - malware has always had the ability to be updated in the field, it has always been able to be remote controlled, and it has always had the ability to spawn a remote shell to a live attacker. And, it has always had the ability to scan the file-system for files like source-code and CAD drawings, and it has always had the ability to exfiltrate those files. At all times and without exception, these malware programs have been operated by real and persistent humans at the other end. The malware doesn't operate itself, it's not an automaton. For the last 365 days, I just called that malware.

http://fasthorizon.blogspot.com/2010/02/is-term-malware-eclipsed-by-apt.html

Comment Re:Physical access (Score 3, Interesting) 150

There'll always be people who prefer walking into a building to do their banking, but for the rest it's entirely possible to have a non-physical bank.

To take the example of ING, they used to rely purely on online and phone banking (ie. no physical branches period) but have now added the post office network for physical needs and rely on other bank's ATMs for physical money withdrawal. Of course an online bank would need to have excellent reliability on their online systems and excellent customer service on their phone centres, but if you have both then what's the big deal?

Frankly, if a bank is untrustworthy it doesn't matter whether they're physical or purely virtual .. to follow-on from your example, there's nothing to stop a bricks-and-mortar bank from closing your account and giving you the run around, being able to walk into a branch won't change that one iota.

Comment Re:Not supprising (Score 2, Informative) 150

Agree entirely .. the really stupid thing about it all is that the only reason they do so is to pad the balance sheet and meet the unrealistic expectation that profits must go up each year. Anything less is a failure.

Because the big four banks are already so large, it’s impossible for them collectively to grow at a faster rate than the overall economy. For one bank to enjoy higher growth means that they have to market share off the other three, and the big banks appear deeply reluctant to do this.

It’s clear from recent comments made by the banks that they’re dissatisfied with the rate at which their lending is growing. And this is backed by recent statistics from the Reserve Bank which show that while total bank lending for housing is relatively strong, (rising by 0.6 per cent in August to reach a level that’s 8.1 per cent higher than a year earlier), total business lending actually fell by 0.4 per cent in the month (and was down 4 per cent from a year earlier).

Faced with weak lending growth, the big banks will only be able to continue to report increases in their profits year after year if they are able to maintain – and, preferably build – their interest margins.

But this means that the banks are inevitably on a collision course with the rest of the community.

http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/CBAs-bold-move-may-backfire-pd20101103-ATSKH?OpenDocument

Comment Not surprising (Score 1) 2

On the military front it's been public policy on the part of china to focus on 'asymmetric' warfare, of which electronic warfare capabilities play a major part, for a long time. Some chinese authors even call for atmospheric nuclear bursts for EMP purposes:

EMP Attacks A number of Chinese writers suggest utilizing EMP weapons to dis- rupt the U.S. C4 ISR system. One Chinese source (Dai, 1999, p.272) describes EMP attacks as including
nuclear EMP attacks and nonnuclear EMP attacks. Nuclear and thermonuclear explosions create a large EMP eect that can cause electronic equipment to be overloaded and ruined. This type of large nuclear EMP can cause electronic systems within hundreds to over a thousand kilometers to be destroyed. he eective power of a nonnuclear EMP burst is several million times greater than those of current jammers (reaching 10,000 MW) and can burn unprotected and highly sensitive and even complete electronic equipment (systems) [sic], as well as destroy the normal operation of computer systems. [authors’ translation]

Another source (Nie, 1999, p.185) speaks of using EMP weapons as part of an attack on an aircraft carrier strike group:
We can use the Second Artillery or the Air Force to deliver an EMP bomb to the enemy’s large naval force to destroy the ene- my’s warning and detection systems, operational command sys-Potential Implications for U.S. Theater Access 57 tems, and other electronic information systems. [authors’ transla- tion

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2007/RAND_MG524.pdf

Anybody who's managed a network knows that significant amounts of malicious activity are sourced from china, but what's less known is that this type of attacks (known as "patriotic hacking") had de facto permission if not encouragement from the political aparatus. Nowadays publically such activities are frowned upon, but evidence shows that there's active links between the state and non-state 'hackers' in china (as recorded in http://www.uscc.gov/researchpapers/2009/NorthropGrumman_PRC_Cyber_Paper_FINAL_Approved%20Report_16Oct2009.pdf) that go as far as PRC government agencies posting job ads in 'hacker' forums.

It's not surprising that china represents a cyberthreat, what's surprising is the lack of defensive measures on the US side.

Security

Submission + - China Reverse Engineered Classified NSA OS 2

Pickens writes: "Seymour M. Hersh writes in the New Yorker that China has managed to reverse-engineered a Classified NSA operating system, estimated at between thirty and fifty million lines of computer code, giving China a road map for decrypting the US Navy’s classified intelligence and operational data. The story begins after an American EP-3E Aries II reconnaissance plane on an eavesdropping mission collided with a Chinese interceptor jet over the South China Sea in 2001 and landed at a Chinese F-8 fighter base on Hainan Island, the 24 member crew were unable to completely disable the plane’s equipment and software. Hersh writes that crew of the EP-3E managed to erase the hard drive—“zeroed it out”—but did not destroy the hardware, which left data retrievable: “No one took a hammer.” The Navy’s experts didn’t believe that China was capable of reverse-engineering the plane’s NSA-supplied operating system, but over the next few years the US intelligence community began to “read the tells” that China had gotten access to sensitive traffic and in early 2009, Admiral Timothy J. Keating, then the head of the Pacific Command, brought the issue to the new Obama Administration. "If China had reverse-engineered the EP-3E’s operating system, all such systems in the Navy would have to be replaced, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars," writes Hersch. "After much discussion, several current and former officials said, this was done.""

Comment Re:China (Score 2, Informative) 90

Exactly right, what people don't realise is that china has a revanchist desire against the west for the past 150 years. The americans were not the main protagonists against them, but they represent the system. Suffice to say that the assumptions made by the US in engaging china don't agree with what the chinese themselves think:

...

China has long viewed American pre-eminence in the region as a historical accident and an aberration. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) feels enormously uncomfortable existing in a regional order that is based not just on open trade, freedom of the seas and rule-of-law, but also on a democratic community backed by American naval power and military alliances. Look through Chinese strategic documents over the past decade and around four-fifths are about how best to bind, dilute, circumvent or supersede American power and influence.

Rudd is correct to suggest that China has become a "major stakeholder" in the regional and global system. But the broad-brush approach by America and its partners in Asia has been to encourage China to be a "responsible stakeholder" as it rises – one that will increasingly uphold and strengthen the existing order rather than seek to challenge or subvert it. But the latter is precisely what Beijing is looking to do, even as it has been a significant beneficiary of the current system.

Washington erroneously assumes it can shape Chinese goals and purposes. While encouraging China to be a responsible stakeholder is seen as an end-game in the US, internal debates within China reveal that Beijing sees behaving as a responsible stakeholder as a way to bide its time while it builds what it terms Chinese "comprehensive national power."

The responsible stakeholder approach is designed to entrench China as a status quo power because it has been allowed to benefit from the current system. For example, China benefits enormously from the US naval role in the South China Sea, which helps trade and commerce to thrive by protecting trade routes. Yet while the US devotes ships, troops and money to these efforts, China benefits as a security free-loader in the region instead of a trusted contributor.

China has not become an entrenched stakeholder within the US-led region. Indeed, its disruptive claims to over four-fifths of the South China Sea have only intensified, rather than faded, as it continues to rise within the existing order. This approach assumes there is no alternative for emerging states but to compete within the existing open and liberal order.

The responsible stakeholder framework does not account for the fact that rising participants – especially genuinely powerful ones – can seek to gradually dismantle and redesign the current order from within. Subversion and "winning without fighting," rather than confrontation and contest, is the prudent Chinese strategy for undermining both the US and the strength of Washington’s security alliances and partnerships in Asia-Pacific.

The responsible stakeholder framework also assumes that Chinese interests and ambitions are elastic and can be molded according to the circumstances of China's rise. This argument ignores compelling historical and contemporary evidence that China is predisposed to seek leadership of Asia and to recast the regional order according to its preferences. After all, regaining its paramount place in the region is inextricable from reversing what Chinese history books describe as 150 years of humiliation at the hands of western and Japanese powers.

...

http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/China-power-economic-west-foreign-relations-policy-pd20100506-579DV?opendocument&src=rss

Unfortunately there's many similarities between interwar Germany and China at present, including:

- Revanchism for past humiliations

- An internal myth of superiority. Both believed that they're predestined to be at the top of the pile.

- An increasingly jingoistic sentiment in the population fed by state propaganda

There's an increasingly explosive mix of factors in china that people would be fools to ignore.

Government

Submission + - China is now denying it will cut rare earth export (google.com)

ndogg writes: "China is denying that it will cut any exports of rare earths exports saying that the recent reports about such a move are completely groundless. However, they reserved the right to impose restrictions on mining, production, and exports based on output, demand, and sustainability."

Submission + - Cloud Computing finally penetrates e-banking servi

vlamby writes: It is refreshing to see that the traditional bank safe is being given a facelift with the introduction of the digital safe deposit box where you can store your passwords, important docs etc in the Cloud and access them at anytime and from anywhere.

Sadly, online banking services have not changed much in the last decade so it’s nice to see the traditional bank safe finally being updated to a digital safe deposit box. In Switzerland you can already get these services as an add-on through some private banks and other banks will add them to their customers' e-banking profiles shortly. Then perhaps we will not have to wait too long for the option to reach the US too.

Comment Privacy concerns? (Score 1) 210

Given that sensitive internal documents would also be authored via office suite products, who in their right mind would give MS their crown jewels? Ultimately any webservice entails the forwarding of the data to the provider for processing, which means that MS might have access to all sorts of sensitive data.

The alternative is to have dual-installs or local installs for people handling sensitive documents but why not just have local installs across the user base anyway then? There might be some benefits in terms of reduction of maintenance of local installs but you're really gambling if you expect people to use different tools for different types of documents

Comment This is why fermented foods are healthy (Score 4, Interesting) 227

Part of the reason why fermented foods are so good for you is that bacteria have heavy involvement. These are different bacteria to those in the gut, but the bacterial processes involved in fermentation lead to additional benefits greater than what the ingredients alone probide. For example kimchi has been found to produce intermediate compounds that are then used by the body to produce anti-fungal and anti-microbial compounds

Kimchi, a traditional Korean food, is a well-known lactic acid-fermented vegetable product, and is a good source of industrially useful lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The microorganisms involved in the fermentation of kimchi include approximately 200 species of bacteria and several yeasts. The LAB involved in this fermentation continuously produce organic acids after an optimum ripening time, and cause changes in the composition of the product, referred to as the over-ripening or acid deterioration of kimchi.

The over-ripening of kimchi is the most serious concern when it is in storage. Since the over-ripening is mainly due to acid-forming LAB, the best way to overcome this issue is to control the growth of LAB without destroying the quality of the end product. The LAB play an important role in the taste of kimchi, and many LAB from kimchi have antimicrobial activity in addition to other useful properties.

Recently, scientists at Chosun University investigated LAB from kimchi as molecular sources for various end products, including antimicrobial compounds. Antimicrobial compounds are relatively abundant in traditionally fermented foods, in which they may play an important role as competitors with natural microflora during fermentation. Antimicrobial compound-producing LAB may be useful in preserving kimchi. This can be done by either directly applying the LAB to the culture or by adding LAB-produced antimicrobial compounds as natural bio-preservatives.

http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/193478661.html

Kimchi's probably the best example of the benefits of fermented food, but more familiar foods like yoghurt and sauerkraut are also good to eat.

Comment Re:I can see the historians now (Score 1) 470

Japan's goal in WWII was basically a unification of Asia so it could be independent of Western "superiority". Also anecdotal evidence (mostly from my grandparents) says that the Japanese themselves weren't the ones raping and killing the captured population, just the Koreans who worked for them.

In regards to the "co-prosperity" sphere, suffice to say that the countries that were part of that during peacetime, namely korea and taiwan, came out of WW2 as some of the poorest in the world, even worse than african colonies and that's saying something.

In korea's case, as it's the best example of the loot and pillage methodology of japan, the per capita GDP was around $70. Comparatively Thailand was at about $210 GDP per capita and only India was lower than that at the time, but only because of the huge population difference. This despite the fact that the japanese exported an average of more than 100 million Yen in gold alone (official figures, but they're likely to be higher) from korea during the colonial era.

Given a japanese victory the only co-prosperity the philippines would've seen is the 'three-all' policies .. Loot all, kill all, destroy all. You and your grandparents should consider yourself lucky not to have experienced the tender mercies of the japanese for an extended period.

In regards to the smearing about the koreans being responsible for attrocious acts, the colonials (koreans, chinese, and taiwanese) were ordered to do the dirty deeds precisely so that naive and ignorant people would believe them when they claimed to be "innocent".

Even casual inspection shows that this is a load of steaming manure, I'll just quote two authors on the topic:

To the Japanese, Koreans were only slightly better than the Allied prisoners. For their part, the Koreans would have felt little loyalty towards Japan, which had invaded and brutalised their country for decades. One Korean POW guard, Kasayama Yoshikichi, said of his feelings toward the Japanese:

"After the first couple of years, we didn’t hide our feelings any longer ‘Do you think we’re going to let you shit on us till we die?’ The Japanese apologised and grovelled when they didn’t have their rifles."

One doctor witnessed three Korean guards attack a Japanese captain in his sleep, and one of the guards repeatedly asked the doctor for poison to kill this officer

from "More Complex than a Stereotype: Australian POW Doctors and the Japanese in Captivity, 1942–451", Rosalind Hearder

UTSUMI Aiko of Keisen University, Japan, conducted extensive research on Korean POW guards and found that more than 3,000 young Korean men were "recruited" (that is "press-ganged" or otherwise forced to "volunteer") for the prison guard corps. Many of [them] feared they would be shipped to Japan as indentured servants if they did not join the corps. Others were perhaps attracted by the high pay rates offered - 50 yen a month, a large amount at that time. [They] were classified as civilian employees rather than members of the military, and many hoped this status would prevent their transfer to the front line and ... allow them to be demobilized after their two-year contract was concluded. However, on joining, the new recruits were issued with uniforms, and their basic training was very much military in character, including weapons training. Despite the difference between the promise and the reality of the guard corps, few deserted, possibly because deserters were threatened with court-martial.

...

The Koreans were trained in Japanese and forbidden to use their native tongue. They were also given Japanese names in place of their Korean names. They were instructed to treat POWs as animals as a way of ensuring their fear and respect. They were trained primarily in the Japanese Field Service Code, and they were frequently beaten by Japanese officers, for no justifiable reason. The Geneva Convention was never mentioned. In other words they were trained as de facto Japanese soldiers, yet their rank of "kanshi-hei" (guard) was lower than that of a private, and there was no possibility of promotion. Clearly the Korean guards ... were treated as second-class soldiers within the forces, bound by the same iron discipline, yet enjoying none of the prestige accorded to Japanese soldiers. Indeed, one of their unstated functions ... was to give the Japanese soldiers someone to look down on, thus strengthening a sense of ethnic solidarity among the Japanese and minimizing the resentment felt by Japanese troops toward their officers.

from Hidden Horrors: Japanese War Crimes in World War II by Yuki TANAKA

Note specifically the phrase "They were instructed to treat POWs as animals". And refusal brought about a firing squad or beheading. Placed in such a situation there's not many people who'd choose death.

Although I don't discount that some may not have been as coerced, blanket statements scapegoating koreans especially (taiwanese were also treated the same way but to a lesser extent) like you have is exactly what the japanese intended when they conscripted koreans .. patsies that could be put up to take the fall, despite the fact they had no choice. Suffice to say that you'd have to be incredibly naive or partisan to believe that they did not have complete control of what was carried out in their name.

Given the racial superiority views that the japanese lived under at that point it would surprise if they were to treat the philippinos as well as that .. if anything worse.

You should count your lucky star that you live in a world where you're not part of a "co-prosperity" sphere under japanese guidance instead of believing the propaganda either out of ignorance or fanboyism.

Slashdot Top Deals

We gave you an atomic bomb, what do you want, mermaids? -- I. I. Rabi to the Atomic Energy Commission

Working...