But not climate change research it's the exception.

So if hacker activists set the Peruvian embassy on fire or just deploy (they wouldn't use drones would they?) lots of smoke bombs/generators and maybe even some tear gas into the embassy grounds to force an evacuation and potential arrest of Jullian that would be OK right? Just a hack, no big deal, nobody should get hurt. They certainly wouldn't use incendiaries that isn't a hack right that is something else? The Peruvians should have had better security and since they didn't...

Too extreme? OK, the hackers can just set off fire alarms which would bring the fire department and if planned in advance, maybe a few special service personnel to ensure that everyone evacuates.

I'd have to guess that WikiLeaks and JA are going down. This is getting dangerous and ugly.

So you've been giving your life's data to Google for convenience but somehow you feel cheated that someone else wants access too. Is Google special? Yes! Should you trust them? No! Is there a price to be paid for convenience? Yes!

One thing is for sure, we'll reach the wrong conclusion and push people to do the wrong thing.

"The Asian tiger mosquito particularly bites in forests during the day and has been known as the forest day mosquito for this very reason. Depending upon region and biotype, there are differing active peaks, but for the most part they rest during the morning and night hours."

So guess how effective nocturnal feeding bats would be in controlling the Asian tiger mosquito?

I don't about you, but security is very important to me. Without A/C my domicile would be much less secure.

First time I've heard that. It's really much "milder" to my ears than anti-abortion. You know, kind of like describing our president as anti-choice after he lied about "If you like your plan you can keep your plan"

You're assuming that the state has a location. Why can't the state exist in many/any place at the same time? Entanglement may just be the case where a single state is shared.

How can you insult the intelligence of hires with a "lie detector" test? I mean you walk in and they say, oh we want the best and brightest, now line up for your lie detector test. Really, does that work?

I've watched more than a few college football games and somehow they've figured out how to have almost scantily clad people that are acceptable to most people. MS, take notice! Just bring in some SEC cheerleader squads next time.

Sounds like this is a not so subtle red flag from amazon warning everybody that the (weak) encryption on their devices has been compromised and cannot be fixed.

As mentioned previously, most people do not have pass-codes on their Kindles so I'm not sure what possible use encryption could have on such lowly devices. In any case assume you have been warned, encryption is weak and won't keep your data secret on amazon devices.

I"m surprised you don't have a standard form that explains that the employee has the right to opt out of the company's intrusive tracking of the use of a personal phone. And, the employee guarantees than no one under 13 years of age will be allowed to use the phone.

I recently heard a young man claim that he had become a sheepdog when he joined a local police department. That attitude really scares me. I tend to think of most of them as scarecrows.

Clueless! Read up on range design. You don't design for the general, you design for the exception.

http://www.nssf.org/ranges/ran...

"We also must gauge the maximum range of typical small-arms ammunition. The .22 long rifle is going about 4,590 feet. That is just under a mile. The .223 travels about two miles. The .30-caliber is going about 15,000 feet or three miles. Those are considerable distances."