Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Probably shouldn't blame the seller (Score 2, Interesting) 454

The company I work for uses a third party (bazaarvoice) for our reviews so we cannot do such shenanigans. Since we don't just sell one brand we actually want the customer to know which product is the best so that they continue to buy from us. I'm sure this is how all resellers operate so what I suspect actually happened is that the review did make it to the site but the manufacturer probably had someone log in as a bunch of separate users and mark the review as objectionable so that it was taken down.

As others have already mentioned; you can't trust reviews. My personal policy with this is ignore the 1 star - "was broken when I got it" and the 10 star - "changed my life" reviews since they don't actually have any useful information. Also, a lot of sites track user submissions so you can guess that if a person writes an unusually long review about how great their new $30 vacuum is but they've never written another review that it's probably bogus.

Comment Re:Cautiously Optimistic (Score 1) 132

But a tool like this is only going to be as good as the people who use it.

I understand your pain at work since I have the same email problem as you. People use email as a substitute for a meeting and try to come to a consensus all while constantly asking everyone else for input. So you end up with an email chain 50 replies long with more questions than you started with and somehow you have to decipher what people meant when they said, "yeah, let's do that."

Our signal to noise ratio probably won't be any better with Google Wave but at least everything will be in one place so if you have a project manager they can hopefully moderate the discussion in a meaningful direction.

I shudder to think of the bandwidth pipewise and processorwise that this protocol will take and am sufficiently awed at Google's sheer audacity to do such a deed.

Comment Re:Google behind HTML5... Not behind Theora (Score 1) 187

Okay, the parent linked article says FUD, you say FUD, and the article you link to says FUD. I admit there's uncertainty and doubt but where's the fear?

The simple truth is that Theroa has a lot of catching up to do which is completely fair since it's up against a codec family which has been in constant development for, well, ever. In my experience it has a hard time keeping up with motion which is not something which can be shown with single frames like your linked article does. I don't think we'll see the Internet embrace Theroa until its quality is truly comparable to h.264 or when h.264 starts charging for use. Just saying we should use it without any compelling reason other than that it's free isn't going to win any converts since it is always going to be free for the client.

Comment Re:My fellow Americans (Score 1) 438

I think the reason you see so many people with a "nasty Euros" attitude is that this is being reported as being driven by opera.

Opera is seen as running to the government to level the playing field. Not a horrible thing from a user choice perspective but we have another browser, firefox, which has already almost dethroned ie by simply providing better software. So, IMHO the main issue people have with this is why opera couldn't stand on its own merits.

Plus, as others have noted, the browser wars are over. The real battle is in search.

Slashdot Top Deals

Too much of everything is just enough. -- Bob Wier

Working...