What I'm hoping for are some other upstart competitiors to Google Fiber.

Google has said several times that this is exactly what they're trying to foster. Google gets an advantage from deploying fiber aside from the privacy issues that most people consider. They get loyalty. When one of their features is to "[r]ecord up to eight programs simultaneously, just because you can," it engenders a loyalty that the others can't touch.

From what they've said, I expect they don't really want to be in the ISP business, but as their core business depends in large part on growing bandwidth, they felt they had to do something to push the boundary. I would gladly pay $300 (or even more) for gigabit service. I moved to my current location specifically for FiOS availability and pay $105/month for 150/65 service. I am considering moving from Dallas to Austin in the near term mostly because I like the community, but also now in large part due to Google Fiber coming to the area. Everybody (Austin, Google, and me) wins then.

Paying attention to something doesn't necessarily mean looking at it. When I want to figure out what the traffic guy is saying, I have to pay attention to it even if I'm not staring at the radio. I don't pull over to the side of the road to do it. Likewise, I can converse with a passenger, paying attention to what is being said without staring at them.

Actually, judges usually don't ignore the intent of the law. I've read many decisions at all levels, and where there is an assertion of vagueness or ambiguity, the courts almost always look to debate, statute prefaces, and even public statements to determine what was expected. Lower courts do this because higher courts do, and judges don't like to get overturned on that point.

You must be a lot of fun on road trips. By your words, there should be no talking with passengers, no radio, nothing at all.

You can actually get people killed that way because something to engage the brain to some degree aside from driving, people tend to zone out or fall asleep. There's been some research on this and it's been found that zero distractions from the road turns out to be as dangerous as driving while using a cell phone or being mildly drunk. Those minor distractions keep the brain engaged, particularly on road segments that don't change much.

Not always intentionally incorrect, either. Sometimes they're just prepping two possible stories with different headlines and differing by only a paragraph or two.

I have no problem with widescreen if there's a decent resolution. It makes putting two pages of document up (or two documents up) easier. I'm pretty satisfied with battery life, speed, and so on, but the screen resolutions seem stuck. I'm hoping that we'll see a good step up from 1920 resolutions this year when the Haswell notebooks arrive.

Corporations are treated as groups of citizens, not as citizens themselves. It's hard, perhaps impossible to separate the right of people to assemble and to speak freely (which may require money) without overriding the First Amendment.

That's not to say I agree with the outcome. I think the "super-PACs" have proven to be an enormously corrupting influence on the electoral system much faster than the Court thought would happen. At this point, I wouldn't mind restricting the ability for all groups, whether corporations, unions, or other political interests to participate in the campaigns. This may require a new amendment, though.

The 16th Amendment was passed specifically to override the Court's decision in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust on how certain income taxes were handled.

I follow some district and appellate court decisions, and they're usually fairly readable, too. Motions made by attorneys can be opaque, but often follow a pretty strict form and are fairly easy to read once you figure out which boilerplate phrases basically mean simpler things.

The difference is very real on the diplomatic playing field. Those who fight don't much care; they just do their job. But there are additional consequences to a declared war because it tends to become a drive to win unlike those of undeclared wars which can wind down more quietly. A declared war on North Korea may well have brought the Soviets in on a scale greater than actually happened. A declared war in Vietnam might have opened up the bombing of any ship in Hanoi Harbor, many of which were Soviet supply vessels. Either of those could have opened fighting in a wider area of the West Pacific, and Europe would have been a lot more tense than it was.

We say North Korea is developing nuclear weapons in violation of the Nonproliferation treaty.

No, we don't, because North Korea withdrew from the NPT in 2003. Since that time, it has not been under the restraints required by the treaty.

That doesn't make the world any happier about them developing nuclear weapons, but no one is saying they're violating a treaty they're no longer part of.

South Korea is at war with North Korea. The US never declared war on North Korea. It took part in a UN-sanctioned action to defend South Korea.

The convention in the United States for decades has been to places periods inside the quotation marks. All others are based on the actual quote. The Chicago Manual of Style, as one of many, recommends this, but most guides point out that the British style placing anything not part of the quote outside of the quotation marks is acceptable but may be seen as unusual to American readers--of all ages.

I wrote several of the old V&V adventures. I have many fond memories of dropping by FGUs offices and seeing guys like Jeff Dee & Bill Willingham toiling in the art hole . . . sometimes working on art for my RPG adventures!

For several years dealing with FGU was a good enough gig, but the publisher just sort of disappeared after the late 90s.

I had given up hearing from him ever again when Jeff pointed out that the company was still in business, sort of, and selling my stuff.

I eventually got back royalties, and even had a trunk manuscript (for another game system) published, but it is an uncomfortable situation. V&V aside, what other rights are up in the air?

I hope the appeal gets processed quickly so Monkey House can start work on V&V e3 and I can work on new editions of my old stuff for them!

. . . Mar 12 11:57:03 hedvig kernel:WILL I DREAM?