Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:This is a-posteriori explanation of GP-B issue (Score 1) 329

That's cute, but the so-called "gravitomagnetic effect" is not gravitational at all, it's purely magnetic. As Wikipedia puts it,

The main consequence of the gravitomagnetic force...is that a free-falling object near a massive rotating object will itself rotate.

not gravity. gravitomagnetic. It's just a gyroscope.

Comment Re:Next up: Collateral Employee Obligations (Score 1) 262

You have it precisely. This is very simple team dynamics. How can they get it so confused? It's well known (although strange) that in small groups (2-5 I think) having a non-participating member in the group increases the group's performance. This is easy to see, if you look:

1) Non-participating member makes jokes. Other members get slightly jealous and annoyed: they want to disassociate with this joker and work more. They are also slightly amused, although they'd never admit it, and thus work is easier for them.

2) Non-participating members don't contribute to expected workfarce. If a project that takes 8 work hours is due in 2 hours with 4 working members, it'll not get done because all the workers expect to put in 2 hours. None of them can, of course: they have to blink sometime. But with 3 working members, they all overestimate the amount of work they need to do, and the work is done in an hour and a half.

3) If you're participating and someone else isn't, you're not the one who's gonna get fired. At least, not if you work at Microsoft. Job security definitely increases productivity.

The only problem is the lack of a sense of fairness. The nonworker of course is just sitting back, so everyone feels it's unfair. But if they can get over their frustration and anger dealing with that, (which they should be able to do, given that life is such a bitch anyway), the nonworker actually contributes more to the team than any of the workers do.

Comment Re:This just in! (Score 1) 1316

I think that's hilarious. School is way harder than the real world.

I'm coming back to academia from the 'real world,' where I worked a 'real job' as a domestic consultant. I got paid more than they ever indicated I would make in school. I got to have a hell of a lot more fun. And I got to meet some really cool people. Shit yeah I had to do a lot of work, who doesn't?

SCHOOL is SHOCKING.
Speech class: standing ovation, for my speech alone. Grade? D+.
Data structures: aced all the exams and tests. Except the final, which I somehow got a ZERO on, teacher never handed it back. Got a C- in the course. (at least a C- required for upper division courses, so I figure this is aimed at my GPA, since I won't likely retake it)
Biology: Everyone in the class comes to me for help. My grade? D.
Chemistry: Same as biology.

?? They're too worried about narcissism. I'm a genius, but I know I have faults. Still, they are harking on them way too much. I'm a great worker and the teachers are making me want to suicide.

Comment Re:Information is not property. (Score 1) 155

How is your copy's value reduced to zero? Neither copy is of zero value at any point, since either copy may be sold (legally or illegally) for real value. Your value comes from the ability/"legal right" to distribute information, not from the information itself. Information by itself is invaluable, it's the withholding of information that can have a debt instead, are you following the basics here?

If I were to create a glut of availability for your information (eg distribute it for free), that would be violating your property rights - because you OWN the RIGHT to distribute that information, see? Not because you own the information itself.

When it comes to a particular song the same effect comes into play. If I just steal the song, I haven't hurt you. It's not until I start distributing that there is a problem. But here the problem is confounded by the idea that leeching is bad, so your social mores against leaching(eg, pay for what you get) lead you to DISTRIBUTE the data as well!! The morality is really screwed up if you follow it around ;) anyway, enjoy...

Your medical information is not your property just because you have the right to control it. You have the right to control its dissemination to some small extent (you can prevent the public from seeing it, sometimes, if they aren't very interested). That doesn't make it property. That just means you have rights associated with it.

Comment Re:Oh, I Was Kind of Looking Forward to It (Score 1) 155

This was all just an excuse. Welcome to the culture war... nothing is what it seems.

In this episode we managed to equate information with materials, increase the corruption coefficient of several members of Parliament, and decrease the credibility coefficient of that annoying guy with the corruption coefficient of zero. Bob is so annoying.

Comment Re:More importantly. (Score 1) 155

No. More importantly and relevantly,

1) it's not fine to steal things of low value.
2) the RIAA wants you to think stealing a song is like stealing a bar of soap, not like stealing a television - which means later they're going to be talking about the television more
3) stealing songs is not like stealing a bar of soap at all, because you didn't bring your own materials and copying machine(soap maker? lol..) to copy the soap, so you took the materials they used to make it.

most important and relevant of all,
4) MATERIALS are PROPERTY and INFORMATION is NOT.

Comment Re:In other words... (Score 1) 155

Nope, still not a good analogy.

By putting the soap in the bathroom, they put some soap in their hotel room. That doesn't mean you have the right to take it out of the hotel room. Do you have the right to take the television? It doesn't matter how much it cost.

I like the old analogies.

1) Hacking into a system is not like breaking into a house and stealing the jewels. It's more like looking through the window and seeing a winning lottery number.

2) Downloading music online is not like stealing CD's from the music store. It's more like reading the newspaper that someone left on the bus, oh and maybe making a copy with the special elite 9000DPI possibly-virus-infected portable ultralight camouflaged optical character recognizing handheld scanner which you, of course, being the super 1337 and ultra hip Civil Disobedient you are, never leave home without.

They can arrest you for taking the soap. They just don't because it would be awful for public relations. Yes PR is the reason, not because it didn't cost them anything or because they don't care about the soap, it's because of PR, otherwise they would arrest you. Does McDonald's still give you ketchup if you don't ask? No. The ketchup packets cost money. So do bars of soap. Remember: hotels are corporations, and corporations (at least ones who have to deal with the public) don't make money without looking like they have a heart. But the heart is fake, don't fall for it.

Similarly, arresting someone for downloading a song is a bad idea. Better to make their connection not work as well afterward. Better to fine them, make them waste their time in court, better to send a letter to their address and cause some fear and drama, better to tell their school that they are degenerate lowlives, better to spam congress and other cultural outlets about the depravity of today's children...

it's the same ol... I'm amazed, authority is not so scared that it won't allow itself a name anymore...

Comment Re:In other words... (Score 1) 155

A perfect analogy? Wow, who do you work for?

It would be a more perfect analogy if the soap didn't cost the hotel anything. Since it does, this analogy introduces external influences that were not previously part of the equation. THAT is why it's a perfect analogy (for the RIAA) - because it gives them a lever to say, "stealing this one song was worth a bar of soap, but that's not all they did. They stole that song and sent it to 100,000 other people, along with 60 video games and 1000 episodes of television specials and a glut of movies so large we can't even store the LIST on our drives. THAT is definitely worth a life sentence in jail."

Back when it was all just bits flying across a line without costing anyone anything, none of that could be said. But because we imply that stealing a song has a monetary value roughly equivalent to a bar of soap - and if we allow that analogy to hold in society - then this is the outcome. So I ask again who do you work for?

Comment Re:Why not? (Score 1) 155

Not to mention the difference between taking a bar of soap and taking a newspaper.

Although, these days the only difference between a bar of soap and a newspaper(or mp3) is the overhead... most all commercialized products are just copied information no matter how you look at it.

Comment Re:d'curriculum' = 0 (Score 1) 931

Seriously. Everyone's overlooking that most important point, heh. What I want to know is, when are we going to start getting test answers on www.ratemyteachers.com?

Aside from that it's also rather amusing that the story's fake, posted by some 30 year old about high school if you rtfa.

Slashdot Top Deals

If Machiavelli were a hacker, he'd have worked for the CSSG. -- Phil Lapsley

Working...