Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:100% Wikileaks' fault (Score 1) 289

Sorry, none of your points hold water. Defence in depth, Separation of duties and Discretionary access control are all well known security tenets.

But in the WikiLeaks scenario, what is "the damage"? If any one journalist is "compromised" (say, publishes the password in a book), all the cables go public unredacted. This is true whether they are all sharing the same password or not.

No, and that is the whole point. If they publish the password in a book, then they themselves must also publish their copy of the archive - or the password is useless. So if one organisation publishes their file, and then another publishes their password, there is no issue.

Comment 100% Wikileaks' fault (Score 1) 289

If you are going to share extremely sensitive documents with several people, why the FUCK wouldn't you create several *different archives* with different passwords - one for each individual you are sharing the information with?!

Give each individual access for a short period of time, and then DELETE THE INDIVIDUAL FUCKING ARCHIVES FROM YOUR SERVER! This has the additional benefit of being able to trace any future leaks.

Seriously, if you have disseminated the password to your single "master copy" archive to multiple organisations, then it might as well not be encrypted. If they had created different archives + passwords for each recipient this would be a non-issue.

An analogous situation is where you're setting up a webserver which hosts multiple sites/apps. You run the server process of each site as a different user because that way if one site is exploited, the damage is contained to that site only.

I seriously wonder if Wikileaks employees run their desktops as root.

Comment Re:That's not what happened (Score 1) 103

Do you think it's wrong to have a rifle in the house? My very point is that back when I grew up, ALMOST EVERYONE had one. Do you see what they did there?

You can still have a rifle in the house. It just can't be semi-automatic. This means that the guy who wants to do target practice or shoot roos can do so, but the guy who wants to easily kill as many people as possible in a short period of time has some difficulties.

How is that a bad thing?

Comment Re:Each major release is taking longer (Score 5, Informative) 212

Did they return the multiple desktop and individual backgrounds? Locking Apps to specific Desktops?

Yes.

No they haven't and they're still pushing Dolphin as the File manager instead of sticking with Konq, which worked quite well for that and browsing the web. Hell I found it quite useful when accessing an ftp site that I had write privs as it allowed me to simply copy files from the system to the server.

Yes they have. Konqeror is still there, and can be set as the default file manager if you want.

As a 3.5 user, I would have preferred them to simply bug fix and transition 3.5 over to QT4. Some of the restructuring was needed but the complete change to the UI was totally unneeded. Instead they had to copy MS and Vista and loose the one feature that made KDE stand out for me, which was the configurable desktops, background images and locking apps to specific desktops.

As I said, all these features are available, accessible, and are arguably better than they were in KDE 3. I honestly don't know how you haven't been able to discover them.

Submission + - A pound of flesh: how Cisco's "unmitigated gall" d (arstechnica.com)

CortxVortx writes: High-tech entrepreneur Peter Adekeye's yearlong nightmare began after he dropped his wife off at the Vancouver International airport and headed downtown to The Wedgewood, a posh boutique hotel. Inside a tasteful boardroom adorned with gilt-framed mirrors, the US District Court for Northern California, San Jose division, had convened a special sitting to hear Adekeye's deposition as part of a massive antitrust action he had launched against his former employer, the computer giant Cisco Systems. At 5:15pm, however, two plainclothes women—the shorter one brandishing a badge—and two uniformed police officers entered the room. Adekeye was confused, as were his two Wall Street lawyers and the special judicial master conducting the hearing. But the four lawyers for Cisco knew exactly what was going on...

Comment Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice (Score 1) 300

I doubt the US government has much motivation to attempt helping Somalia again... I think you'll learn why so many governments appear to be ignoring Somalia.

On the contrary, the US is very interested in Somalia for the very same reasons the pirates are - it's lack of government and infrastructure means whoever has the most money/guns in their own patch is the law. This makes it an ideal location for the CIA to set up secret prisons, as well as pirates to set up their base of operations.

Comment Re:It's China... (Score 1) 171

A democracy needs to be controlled by the citizens though, and not the citizens controlled by the government's propaganda.

The US government is controlled by the citizens. Or were you referring to the proles?

The proles constitute 85% of the population. They receive little education, work at jobs in which tough physical labour is the norm, live in poverty, and usually die by the age of sixty.

...proles are not expected to understand that they are being exploited by the Party as a source of cheap labour and are unable or unwilling to organize resistance. Their functions are simple: work and breed. They care little about anything but home and family, neighbour quarrels, films and football, beer and lottery tickets. They are not required to express support for the Party, except for a mild form of patriotism. The Party creates meaningless songs, novels, even pornography for the proles. Proles do not wear a uniform, can use cosmetics and have a relatively free internal market economy. Proles also have free sex lives, uninterrupted by the Party, and divorce is permitted. Despite the personal freedoms enjoyed by the Proles, the Thought Police moves among them, spreading false rumours and marking down and eliminating any individuals deemed capable of causing trouble.

Comment Re:They are watching... (Score 1) 189

After facebook facial recognition technology comes to fruition, your behavior patterns will be analyzed and recorded, and you may be 're-programmed' to fit back in to society nicely. If you fail to comply with the surveillance overlords, you must be prepared for the inevitable consequences.

Hohoho.. do you really think that facial recognition technology hasn't been there from the beginning?

ScienceDaily (Nov. 12, 1997) — Computer "eyes" are now up to such tasks as watching for fugitives in airline terminals and other busy locations. A sophisticated face-recognition system that placed first in recent Army competitive trials has been given the added ability to pick out faces in noisy or chaotic "street" environments.
The new "Mugspot" software module developed at the University of Southern California automatically analyzes video images, looking for passers-by. When it finds them, it picks out the heads in the images and then tracks the heads for as long as they remain in the camera's field.

Almost 15 years ago, it was already possible to accurately track and recognise people in grainy, blurry, low-res video. As if intelligence agencies *aren't* having a field day with facebook.

Slashdot Top Deals

Mystics always hope that science will some day overtake them. -- Booth Tarkington

Working...