No, this is the cover story for the Umbrella Corporation's Hive
Well, they didn't quite remove it. If you want local notebooks, it appears that you have to pay and subscribe to their online office offering.
Well, in all fairness, you can create a local notebook if you pay ($$$) for an office subscription. However, for what I use, I think it's way too expensive.
On windows, local notebooks are a subscription-only feature ($$$). I imagine it's the same on the mac.
Since others have said the free version requires the use of storage on Microsoft's computers, I suspect Microsoft will be scanning the OneNote data for monetizing purposes. Why else would they prevent the free OneNote users from storing data on non-Microsoft servers?
lol, you haven't looked at the free version, right? They're preventing you from storing data locally, because you have to pay money and subscribe to their online office offering to get local notebooks.
Now, they might still be scanning your notebooks, but the main reason is money.
No, if you try creating a local notebook with the free version, you're greeted with a friendly message that says that you can only create the notebook in onedrive.
No, the free version is cloud-only.
Go on, try creating a local notebook -- you can't do it with the free version.
I uninstalled it after I discovered that.
This.
Also, given the long rebuild times with 2TB drives and larger, one should be using raid6, raidz2 (raidz3?), or mirroring. With the large disk sizes, another disk error can be fairly likely during a rebuild.
You see the ethical dilemma? I don't see one in either TFA, only a question of whether a person would wish to have this information. So long as the person in question is the patient or his doctor, there's no ethical question at hand, merely a personal decision. Could you kindly explain the dilemma to my obviously symptomatic brain? And type slowly.
Damn beta? Damn this version, I hit "options" and my comment was wiped out. Bastages.
It is flimsy as an argument, especially as there's a better argument to be made.
Suppose the colonization succeeds, but only supplies can be sent, with no return trips? Due to lack of refueling capabilities on Mars this is a reasonable assumption for the next many years. Now imagine "many" is large enough that children may be born, live, and die on Mars before return trips become possible.
Now how is such a child, able-bodied, supposed to complete the pillar of Islam that is the Hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca? Since this would be impossible the Mars-born would be spiritually incomplete or something. Since this scenario can be reasonably presupposed, a fatwa which reasoned along these lines might be
All power corrupts, but we need electricity.