The nomenclature is standardized, and "low frequency" refers to frequencies four orders of magnitude lower than UHF
True, but then it would be Low Frequency; the caps denoting a proper label and not a relative term
Patient: "well doctor, what's the result of the radio image?"
Doctor: "This blobby thing here is your body"
Patient: "... and?"
Doctor: "That's all"
Technically, conventional wireless is also in the UHF range, so it makes proper sense to say that these new-application frequencies are lower (which they are). On a side note, some applications of the conventional wireless are in the SHF range, which is higher-frequency than UHF. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_spectrum#By_frequency
Or that their computer is not the monitor?
'Scuse me, mentlegen... what are you trying to say here?
What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon.