Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Off track... (Score 4, Informative) 68

GAT's increase the simplicity of Rust in 3 different ways:

GAT's make Rust 1.65 a *simpler* language than 1.64 was. GAT's aren't new, Rust already had Generics and Associated Types, GAT just lets you use them together. Before the compiler would spit out an error saying "you can't do that" when you used them together, now it just works.

There are several libraries which will have much simpler interfaces with this change.

Also, GAT's are massively simpler and provide almost all of the complexity of Higher Kinded Types (HKT) like you find in Haskell et all.

Increased simplicity, more power.

Comment works great in China (Score 5, Informative) 178

on news ycombinator com, namelsow commented:

It varies through regions. It is completely the opposite in China because:

- No extra app. People scan the QR in WeChat (everybody has it) on the table, it will call a mini-app dynamically (somewhat similar to React Native but interpreted in WeChat).

- You are putting orders directly.

- You are paying within WeChat as well so it's seamless.

- The app is smooth because almost every restaurant is using the takeout giant Meituan's mini-app.

- Almost every single restaurants in China is tech savvy enough to use those systems because it's already a take-out centered society. Restaurants not leveraging these systems have virtually zero chance to survive the competition.

- You don't have to wait for anything or talk to anybody in the whole process.

The problems people mentioned in this thread:

- Minorities, people without smart phone or those are less tech savvy, are left behind.

- The walled garden and monopolies and such.

These problems are real, but it's probably not the QR menu to blame, because it's a far greater problem - in China, you are not allow to go anywhere without WeChat and scanning QR code due to those draconian regulations.

Comment Re:Too bad electricity in China comes from coal (Score 4, Informative) 112

If you don't include transport costs, a 100% coal powered EV and a gasoline car have roughly the same CO2 emissions per kilometre. Which is better depends on which vehicles you choose as comparables.

But the transport of gasoline to filling stations adds ~40% to the gasoline emissions per kilometre. Transporting coal to the generating station is done using more efficient ships and train, so the coal powered EV wins.

Comment Re:"orbit the Earth's polar regions" (Score 1) 63

Starlinks aren't "space junk" because they are under control and will actively adjust their orbits to get out of the way of anything else. They are intentionally deorbited at end of life so they never become space junk.

The Starlinks that fail before deorbiting are space junk, but they deorbit on their own relatively quickly, and failures of that type are quite rare. So no more than a handful at a time.

A handful of pieces of space junk in an area 550 million square kilometres in size. Kessel Syndrome it is not.

Comment Re:No More Patents (Score 5, Interesting) 17

There is no way that Google Assistant contains seven legitimate inventions that meet the standard of "novel and non-obvious" that is supposed to be applied to patent applications. At least 90% of all patents issued are bullshit.

The Sonos patents are also bullshit. Sonos sued Google for a patent on controlling the volume on multiple devices simultaneously. If you sue about bullshit patents, expect to be counter-sued about bullshit patents.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain." -- G. Fitch

Working...