Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet

Submission + - Net neutrality rules sneaked into 'stimulus' bill (votetags.info)

SonicSpike writes: "The House Democrats' $825 billion legislation released on Thursday was supposedly intended to "stimulate" the economy. Backers claimed that speedy approval was vital because the nation is in "a crisis not seen since the Great Depression" and "the economy is shutting down."

That's the rhetoric. But in reality, Democrats are using the 258-page legislation to sneak Net neutrality rules in through the back door.

The so-called stimulus package hands out billions of dollars in grants for broadband and wireless development, primarily in what are called "unserved" and "underserved" areas. The U.S. Department of Commerce is charged with writing checks-with-many-zeros-on-them to eligible recipients, including telecommunications companies, local and state governments, and even construction companies and other businesses that might be interested.

SOURCES:
http://votetags.info/2009/01/net-neutrality-rules-sneaked-into-stimulus-bill/

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/79412"

Security

Submission + - How to suck at Information Security? (sans.org)

wiedzmin writes: Great entry in today's SANS Internet Storm Center Handler's Diary — How to suck at Information Security. My favorite points include:
  • Assume the users will read the security policy because you've asked them to.
  • Assume that policies don't apply to executives.
  • Make someone responsible for managing risk, but don't give the person any power to make decisions.
  • Expect end-users to forgo convenience in place of security.
  • Say "no" whenever asked to approve a request.
  • Stop learning about technologies and attacks.
  • Hire somebody just because he or she has a lot of certifications.
  • Don't cross-train the IT and security staff.
  • Expect your users to remember passwords without writing them down.

Very entertaining and informative read with total of about 4 dozen points. Now if I could only find a way to get management to read it.

Government

Submission + - Are Bush Admin Computers a Crime Scene?

nandemoari writes: David Gewirtz, author of 'Where Have All the Emails Gone?' reportedly wrote an open letter to President-elect Obama asking that his administration please treat the White House computers like crime scene evidence. By failing to preserve official emails, the Bush White House has technically committed a federal crime by violating the Presidential Records Act and The Federal Records Act. The letter goes on to note that any computers left behind — not removed like they were by President George H.W. Bush's team — could contain important information. Any of the computers or computer parts, such as hard drives and other media like flash and thumb drives, may contain traces of those famous missing white house emails.
Government

Submission + - Judge Orders Search Of All White House Computers

PhreakOfTime writes: "The federal magistrate judge overseeing the White House e-mail litigation today said the issue had reached "true emergency conditions" with only "two business days before the new President takes office" and that "the importance of preserving the e-mails cannot be exaggerated," according to the court's Memorandum Opinion issued this morning along with an Order and posted on the National Security Archive website, www.nsarchive.org.

Magistrate Judge John Facciola formally ordered the White House to search all Executive Office of the President components' workstations and portable media for possibly missing e-mail — enforcing yesterday's order from U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy — after government lawyers at a hearing yesterday represented that they would only search those EOP components that create federal agency records and leave out offices that create presidential records."
Windows

Submission + - Russia to Create "National OS" Rival to Wi (blogspot.com) 1

Glyn Moody writes: "Russia's President Medvedev is being asked to fund the creation of a "National OS", based on GNU/Linux. The idea is to reduce Russia's dependency on Western software — both proprietary and free — by developing an operating system that is completely under its control. Strangely, the head of Microsoft Russia is against the idea."

Comment That is not the way of the l33t!!! (Score 0, Offtopic) 290

it means a true l33t cracker could easily start World War III?

A true l33t cracker would NEVER engage an enemy with something as petty as violence or death...

He or She would realize that only escalates and encourages fear, he or she would engage the world with words.

One of the worlds most admirable and effective Social Engineers said: "There are many causes that I am prepared to die for but no causes that I am prepared to kill for."

Google

Submission + - Google Challenging Proposition 8

theodp writes: "Coming the day after it announced layoffs and office closures, Google's Supreme Court filing arguing for the overturn of Proposition 8, which asks the Court not to harm its ability to recruit and retain employees, certainly could have been better-timed. Interestingly, Google's support of same-sex marriage puts it at odds with ex-Microsoft HR Chief Mike Murray, who cited religious beliefs for his decision to contribute $100,000 to 'Yes On 8', quite a surprise coming from the guy charged with diversity and sensitivity training during his ten-year Microsoft stint. Dan'l Lewin, Microsoft's man-in-Silicon-Valley, joined other tech leaders last October to denounce Prop 8 in a full-page newspaper ad."

Comment Re:Simple Solution... (Score 4, Informative) 232

Yelling "Install NoScript you n00bs!!!" won't register noobs... because they're newbs.

Well, I wouldn't call them n00bs firstly... and secondly, most of the technically-savvy geeks/nerds I know read Slashdot and find out new and interesting stuff from here.

One of the best things about Slashdot is if you write something on here, ALOT of people will take notice. So if by providing solutions/information that people can read and take away to tell other non-technically-savvy individuals helps protect at least one person from being scammed, I'm more than happy to yell on Slashdot about it ;)

Comment Re:+1 Funny! :) (Score 4, Insightful) 101

Sounds like a great way to implement censorship or force traffic to follow certain (compromised) routes. Simply say: Wikipedia does something dodgy, they allow free speech and free information, let's revoke their cert (since IANA can be controlled by a government).

Preaching to the converted here my friend...

I immediately thought of this topic when I was reading the BGP article and thinking about the implications of a hierarchal structure (incidentally, they can pretty much "disconnect" direct connections between eachother NOW if they want to... but of course we can route around it, if required - adding encryption/PKI doesn't make all that much of a difference if people don't enforce it).

See, Governments are still duking it out (Diplomatically and Militarily) while their populations talk to eachother on the net' - the wonderful thing about this is I can talk to you, not knowing if you're White, Black, Green, Yellow, Blue, Purple, Male, Female, American, French, Canadian, Belgian or Martian... if you call me an idiot, I can't say "You called me an idiot because I'm (insert racial/gender type here)", well, I CAN, but you can reply... "I didn't know that, but I still just think you're an idiot!".

The concept of a Worldwide Global Communications network with almost ubiquitous availability is something we really haven't had for along time, it's going to take the Governments of the world a bit of time to get their head around it... Personally I think the Politicians/Diplomats of the world should read The Truth by Terry Pratchett (if they haven't already), as it has alot of similar concepts regarding local, social, and geo-political issues in it, just with a different "new" Technology.

Comment Re:Question for the experts (Score 2, Informative) 101

I don't mean public networks, I mean private ones, SWIFT for instance..

Has been a few years since I've worked in the finance arena, but I thought each BIC code was signed (or at least they were talking about it while I was involved in that area) and things like MQSeries channels between nodes that were used for transporting data have been SSL/TLS encrypted for ages? I remember doing it actually, MQ Version 5.2 (or 5.3?) included SSL-over-channel functionality.

Anyways, I'm sure it's being taken care of, maybe get in touch with your bank and ask them if you're concerned?

Comment +1 Funny! :) (Score 2, Interesting) 101

Couldn't you just not do that? Why do the Feds have to roll out a $600k program because of you? That is taxpayers money for gods sake!

I wouldn't do it (I don't even have an AS to play with anymore), and it's rather more complicated than my explination made out...

I think a possible way to implement this would be a Hierarchical model where IANA has a top-level certificate for the trust and then it signs each regional NICs certificate, and they sign AS's which sign their subnets, then IANA could ask various NICs to revoke the Certificates of AS's that do dodgy things (like advertise subnets that aren't theirs), still it would require alot more overheads in terms of processing and memory than BGP currently requires.

I should also mention, I haven't worked with BGP in around 7 years now.

Comment Re:Question for the experts (Score 4, Informative) 101

will this only increase security at things that are .gov? That's the impression I get but I don't know enough technically to be sure.

Pretty much... it means that when Router A says to Router B "I have a new path to this network." the routers will first authenticate eachothers identity utilizing Digital Signatures.

Basically it's applying elements of PKI to router communications, so the router receiving the information knows it can trust other router's updates. If you didn't do it I could (potentially) spoof updates and say "this network exists here now" and all the information destined for that network would then be routed to me to packet-sniff to my heart's content.

This type of stuff (in addition to SSL/TLS encryption of sensitive data communication channels) has been used internally in (most) Banking networks for awhile now, I'm actually surprised they didn't have something like it in place already.

Medicine

Submission + - Coffee can reduce the risk of Alzheimer's disease (theage.com.au) 1

Amenacier writes: "Recent studies by Finnish and Swedish researchers have shown that drinking moderate amounts of coffee can reduce the risk of people getting Alzheimer's disease. The reason for this is as yet unknown, although it has been hypothesised that the high levels of antioxidants found in coffee may play a role in preventing dementia and Alzheimer's. Alternatively, some studies have shown that coffee can protect nerves, which may help prevent Alzheimer's. Other studies have shown that coffee may also help to protect against diabetes, another disease which has been shown to have links to Alzheimer's disease. However, researchers warn against drinking too much coffee, as 3 cups or more may cause hallucinations."
Security

Submission + - Feds plot massive Internet router security upgrade (networkworld.com)

BobB-nw writes: The U.S. federal government is accelerating its efforts to secure the Internet's routing system, with plans this year for the Department of Homeland Security to quadruple its investment in research aimed at adding digital signatures to router communications. DHS says its routing security effort will prevent routing hijack attacks as well as accidental misconfigurations of routing data. The effort is nicknamed BGPSEC because it will secure the Internet's core routing protocol known as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). (A separate federal effort http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/092208-government-web-security.html is under way to bolster another Internet protocol, DNS, and it is called DNSSEC.) Douglas Maughan, program manager for cybersecurity R&D in the DHS Science and Technology Directorate, says his department's spending on router security will rise from around $600,000 per year during the last three years to approximately $2.5 million per year starting in 2009.

Slashdot Top Deals

In every non-trivial program there is at least one bug.

Working...