Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Inconvenient Truth (Score 1) 294

CRT in a nutshell says that whites are superior and need to feel guilty while blacks and minorities are inferior and need help. It teaches people to not think of each others as equals but as racial identities. It also promotes segregation.

Those are core elements within CRT and are a supremacists wet dream. Identity politics, segregation, all are congruent beliefs between them. Some white Supremes are touting white extinction theory but others seem ti welcome the segregation encouraged by the crt movement.

And no I do not have links. Most of this crap is discussed behind encrypted networks that you cannot easily cite. But if you look, you will get dirty and you will eventually find them. This is a problem with the censorship by Google and other big tech. It doesn't remove these thoughts, it just pushes them out of plain site. Racism and racist networks existed long before the internet and will continue to exist without it. You just don't get to see it as easily.

Comment Re: Inconvenient Truth (Score 1) 294

So what if I said and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists - because they should be condemned totally, when I said they were very fine people?

Really, in this day and age you think you can win argument points out of ignorance when anybody can do a cursory examination to find out the facts? You are correct that today's democratic party does stray from the party of the 60s though. In the 60s they were a lot more open about their racism and a lot quieter about their love of communism and socialist ideals. Now it appears they found out they can reverse that order and bank black votes while garnering the support of every loser suffering under the system they worked to put in place. And by loser, I specifically mean people who are stuck under a cycle of dependence due to their policies.

  But we could write a book on the complexities of that along with critical race theory too. It's a lot more than a push for school vouchers. The vouchers are a solution to politicized school boards not listening to parents which is a deeper problem of governance in general. That shouldn't be a surprise seeing how critical race theory is by definition of its creators antithetical to the constitution. Of course critical theory in and of itself has its roots in the Frankfurt school. If you don't understand the significance of that, you have a lot if history reading to catch up on. And I suggest you look for history written before 2000ish to get a wider unsanitized picture.

Comment Re: Inconvenient Truth (Score 1) 294

All my references are in various live streams I watched during the 2020 campaigns. You can look up Richard Spencer voting for Biden if you want. I'm not going to comb through hundreds of hours of video to find a specific few points in time .

It should be no surprise though. Biden gave the eulogy for a Klan member, he has used racist language in the senate several times, and relatively recently had talked about nazi fags. I'm assuming he mean fans as in faggot in the Italian fascism way, not as a homophobic slur. Although he was staunchly opposed to same sex marriage until he found it politically useful. I think Trump was the first president ti support it without having the change a previous position taken while in public office.

Comment Re:The ban hammer is in full swing (Score 1) 294

I don't know. I think almost 80% of the so called lies on fact check dot org is little more than him saying something is the best or great or something similar combined with fact checks that are little more than opinions declared as facts.

I'm just stunned that people are upset and expressing outrage that they couldn't troll a site.

Comment Re: Inconvenient Truth (Score 1, Insightful) 294

I have seen white supremacist holding Biden flags. They also hold Bernie banners. But I'm not sure they are any more real than the ones I've seen holding Trump banners.

Let me ask you something. Suppose I own a bakery that gives out free day old products across town near a competitor's bakery. Assuming 1% of the population is racist, 1 out of 100 people receiving these day old goods might be racist. If a racist person declares my day old baked goods to be the best, does it make me a racist baker? What if this racist told all his racist friends? Does that also make all the minority population who chooses to patronize my bakery because of this same giveaway all the sudden white supremacist?

Traditionally, racist have had a lot more in common with the democrats. Joe Biden even gave the eulogy for a Klan member just a few years ago. White supremacist support critical race theory which appears to be championed by the democrats. So are we sure we have the correct perspective?

Comment Re: Don't read too much into it. (Score 2, Interesting) 294

Can you specify which policies specifically and how they were directly connected?

I've heard this quite a bit but everyone who has attempted to articulate it ends up boiling it down to orange man bad. I get it, there are politicians and political positions I don't like too. It just doesn't make everything the root cause of all evil perpetuated by other people's incompetence down the road.

Comment Re:The ban hammer is in full swing (Score 0) 294

I'm not sure I'm getting the outrage. From what I can see along with the responses in threads like these, the content bring removed is largely trolling with half truths and discounted or debunked media lies from over the years.

So I guess the question is what did people expect? Was it that they would have free reign to harass or insult others with half truths? And does this sting them so much because they were outsmarted?

Slashdot Top Deals

"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines." -- Bertrand Russell

Working...