It's not similar and just because something has been done a certain way doesn't make it accurate.
Proving the point. "Just because "milk" has always been used to describe mammal excretion doesn't make it accurate to claim that's the only use of the word.
If it doesn't come from a mammal it isn't milk. If it comes from a plant it is juice. So the accurate term is coconut juice.
So if you say the word can't be used a certain way, that's a fact? What about 30+ years of using the terms "coconut milk" and "soy milk"? Was everyone who ever uttered these terms just "wrong"?
If anything coconut milk is more like nectar, if you want to go the route of plant drinks that are already called something other than milk. As for nut milk, there's not really a precedent, and "strained puree with water" just doesn't have much of a ring to it. As mentioned, coconut milk and soy milk are already well-established terms.
For lack of a better option, then, and due considering the not-so-short historical usage, " milk" seems like it's the de facto winner.
If you actually do the comparison, you see that bitcoin transaction costs (per $1,000 equivalent) is CHEAPER than dollar.
Um, NO.
Currency has no need to be "efficient". Bitcoin transactions have far less overhead than conventional currency transactions.
Not true. https://digiconomist.net/bitco...
An adequate bootstrap is a contradiction in terms.