Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Finally the wait is over! (Score 4, Informative) 188

The use case I think is quite obvious. There are many applications in the financial world that are still needed, but require not too many changes, i.e. long lasting financial products that are no longer being offered but still active. If they can run these reliably on Linux they can move this to i.e. a VM and send some old and expensive to maintain hardware like mainframes or AIX machines to the scrapheap. If it is an official IBM compiler the software is likely to behave exactly the same which means less testing and a lot less fuss if the software is subject to regulation.
This is not for new stuff, this is for old stuff that still runs fine and has no other need to be coded in a different language other than to get it of expensive hardware.

And yes I know mainframes are still awesome and have their uses, but if you only maintain them for old stuff that is idling most of the time they get to be very expensive overkill.

Comment Re:Immune system science (Score 4, Insightful) 162

How prudent of you..

The studies mentioned are limited, however these are not the only studies. There are quite a few more, including a much larger one in Spain that all have similar outcome: Vitamin D has a very positive effect. Especially Calcifediol which is the active version. If you take Vitamin D it apparantly takes about three days to turn into the active version. There are other studies in hospitals that have shown that almost all deaths had a deficiency.

So the facts are:
- we know Vitamin D is a safe supplement. That's where this differs completely from HCQ. In fact in the Netherlands it is officially considered safe to take 2000 IU with prolonged use. Other countries have higher limits
- it is already known for much longer that it has a positive effect agains respitory infections. This not new
- the effect on controling the cytokinestorm is also well known
- in multiple studies the effects have been shown

So under normal circumstances, not yet enough to base policy on. I do agree on that. However there is a crisis. We should base policy on science. But policy makers and even doctors should not practice science... The policies that are implemented such as masks, social distancing are probably based on less solid science. They have to deal with what is known and especially what is safe.

I am not saying that they should say that taking Vitamin D is the answer and that the focus should not have been on the other measures and the vaccines. I am saying that if people are encouraged to take vitamin D with the stipulation that we don't know for sure how well that works but that it is a safe supplement anyway, it would have quickly given us the facts the data that is now missing. That is something that politicians are afraid to do: stating that they are uncertain.

So if you want to wait until the science is definitive, fine. I consider the fact that it is officially a safe supplement combined with all the positive studies as enough to err on the side of caution. And considering the seriousness of this virus, I think it is prudent to advise this.

Comment Re:Immune system science (Score 3, Informative) 162

Slashdot Top Deals

"There is such a fine line between genius and stupidity." - David St. Hubbins, "Spinal Tap"

Working...