Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Mapping Service Blurs Out Military Bases, But Accidentally Locates Secret Ones (popularmechanics.com)

schwit1 writes: A Russian online mapping company was trying to obscure foreign military bases. But in doing so, it accidentally confirmed their locations—many of which were secret.

Yandex Maps, Russia's leading online map service, blurred the precise locations of Turkish and Israeli military bases, pinpointing their location. The bases host sensitive surface-to-air missile sites and facilities housing nuclear weapons.

The Federation of American Scientists reports that Yandex Maps blurred out "over 300 distinct buildings, airfields, ports, bunkers, storage sites, bases, barracks, nuclear facilities, and random buildings" in the two countries. Some of these facilities were well known, but some of them were not. Not only has Yandex confirmed their locations, the scope of blurring reveals their exact size and shape.

Comment Re: Who measures tilt in cm/inches? (Score 1) 77

Actually a depressingly large number of construction/carpentry/HVAC people. Theyâ(TM)re always talking about a half inch of slope (in a deck) or somewhat.

In fact, the reason we had to be sure to use âoeCelsiusâ rather than the older âoecentigradeâ is because the civil engineering crowd already used the latter for a unit of slope â" calculated as rise over run times 100, IIRC.

Comment Re:Yes, I Got My Flu Shot. But Will It Work? (Score 1) 270

The kids didn't die before -- they just got the flu. I would guess that they hope they won't die this year either.

I understand their point to be that the kids who didn't get the shot (the parents can opt out) turned out to be, in general, no worse off than those who did.

   

Comment Re:Yes, I Got My Flu Shot. But Will It Work? (Score 2) 270

Up until this year, Quebec has offered free flu shots to kids of 6-24 months and everyone over sixty.

But they've decided to cancel them this year for all but "at risk" individuals, not as a cost saving measure, but because they've concluded they don't really work. Or at least haven't for some years now.

http://www.iheartradio.ca/cjad...

Comment Re:Distopian future.. (Score 4, Insightful) 899

I also disagree that it is a more fair system. Someone who is sick and unable to work has much greater need than someone who has a good job. Why would they receive the same sum?

Because it is both fairer and bureaucratically cheaper to pay them both and tax it back from the one who is doing well enough to contribute.

If you simply give everyone a basic amount, there is no niggling, maneuvering, or fraud about eligibility for fifty-three different entitlements. And if you (actually) tax everyone based on their real income -- including said basic amount -- then you eliminate much of the niggling, maneuvering and fraud about seventy-one different tax loopholes and exemptions.

It might even wind up being approximately the same result as we have now, just with 80% fewer bureaucrats and 50% less fraud.

Comment Even More Confused (Score 4, Informative) 175

I guess I don't really understand the question. Here we manage our 70/30 mix of Windows/Linux boxes using Group Policy and RSAT for the Windows boxes and Putty for the Linux ones, but since the Group Policy editor and RSAT run from any Windows box, and Putty is, well, really just SSH, then who cares which actual OS one is running to do the administration?

I guess I don't know enough about really big shops. How do big Linux shops go about doing the Linux equivalent of Group Policy anyway?

Comment Re: But... (Score 1) 330

The reason the per capita (not "capital") number is important is because these immigrants have to be absorbed into society. If Canada accepted as many immigrants as the US in absolute numbers, it couldn't cope with the demands of all of the newcomers all at once.

However, Canada is growing much faster from migration than the US (0.57% vs 0.39%) according to the CIA Factbook https://www.cia.gov/library/pu... .

Comment Re: But... (Score 1) 330

Well, that's the problem actually. The Third Safe Country agreement between the US was supposed to deal with this problem, but it has a big loophole: it only applies to people arriving at official border crossings.

This is why there is such a hullabaloo about families deliberately stepping just across the border at Roxham Road, in full view of RCMP officers, and yards away from the official crossing at Lacolle. They are instantly arrested, but they then can claim asylum as the Third Safe Country agreement doesn't apply.

Also, it's a bit more than four: it averaged about 55 a day last year, totaling 20,593 just crossing between official border stations. This year, numbers are about the same -- 1970 in March, for example ( https://www.canada.ca/en/immig... ).

Canada has been granting asylum to about 50% of them at the moment.

Comment Re:But... (Score 1) 330

..., while they complain endlessly when they see a mere fraction of the immigrants America sees annually.

Somewhere above someone posted figures showing Canada has double the annual per capita immigration rate than does the US (1% vs 0.5% respectively). However, they misstated the Canadian population as 30 million vs. the actual number of 36.3 million, so the actual immigration rates are closer.

Submission + - SPAM: Lidar And Sensor Firm Velodyne 'Baffled' By Uber Self-Driving Death

dryriver writes: The firm that designed the sensors on the Uber self-driving car that killed a woman this week has said its technology was not to blame. San Jose-based Velodyne told the BBC it was "baffled" by the incident, adding its equipment was capable of seeing in the dark. Elaine Herzberg, 49, was struck by the car late on Sunday night in Tempe, Arizona. She died in hospital. Velodyne's Lidar sensors are used by a number of companies testing self-driving cars on public roads today. Velodyne Lidar president Marta Hall told the BBC it would not be advising its customers to halt tests in the wake of the Arizona death because "we do not believe the accident was due to Lidar". Instead, the company is pointing to Uber's on-board computer as potentially being to blame, Ms Hall said. "Our Lidar can see perfectly well in the dark, as well as it sees in daylight, producing millions of points of information. "However, it is up to the rest of the system to interpret and use the data to make decisions. We do not know how the Uber system of decision-making works." While it makes use of third-party hardware, Uber's self-driving cars use software developed in house.
Link to Original Source

Slashdot Top Deals

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...