Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:IPv6 (Score 1) 326

That notion is very alarmist and 1990's era. An ISP can make a pretty good guess of how many lan devices you have using million dollar stat boxes, like sandvine makes. They dont care. ISPs are all media providing machines on another face and they know all your lan devices are just media consuming vehicles with credit card slots strapped on the side. They really don't care. They'll just do metered billing someday and we'll all crab together.

Comment Re:Yeah right (Score 1) 326

It seems wasteful, but it's a convenient boundary to assign to a customer. v6 makes heavy use of 64 bit subnets. An ISP dolling out 48 bit prefixes can expect their customers to use 16 bits for subnetting information, so customers can reasonably have 65,000 networks to do with as they please.

Look at a 6to4 address: 2002 + your v4 address + ABCD (whatever the heck you want) + 64 bits chosen by your computer.

Comment Re:Yea! (Score 1) 326

The catch is that they ran out of 10/8 space for their Internal network and weren't stupid enough to overload it. They deployed v6 to manage the cable modems, and then cable modems needed to be v6, and that was convenient since they're starting to run out of public space addresses, too. Those addresses can't be helped, and they're going to get sucked back into the ISP on the NAT level. Yes, all that malarkey about sharing public v4 addresses with your neighbors is a mathematical inevitability. Read through some current RFCs for a public conversation they are having on the topic of how many customers can you fit on a single v4 address.

Comment Re:Static IP? (Score 1) 326

IPv6 addresses change all the time. They're really good at it. You should learn how DNS works, because it's going to be your new best friend if you ever want to find your needle in the v6 haystack. Even better, you can have a pile of v6 addresses on a single interface, instead of the paltry one v4 address.

Comment Re:Curious what else will accompany it (Score 1) 326

Well, Dual Stack Lite is going to be their long term IPv4 availability, which removes NAT from the CPE and shifts it up into the ISP layer. So all of your transactions will be manipulated inside the ISP's AFTR element, which would be a very convenient place to mine your data stream for goodies. But that would be paranoid to think they would do that. Especially when they could do it anywhere else just as easily!

Patents

Samsung Vs. Apple Tit-For-Tat Down Under 313

New submitter GumphMaster writes "In the latest edition of the Apple vs. Samsung patent fight, the ABC is reporting that Samsung has filed in Australian and Japanese courts seeking an injunction to halt sales of the iPhone 4S for alleged 3G patent violations. It remains to be seen whether Samsung has any better luck with the retaliatory strike in Australian and Japanese courts than it did with courts in the Netherlands. Unfortunately, I expect that Samsung will fail partly because of overseas precedent, but mostly because their patents are sane, technical and narrow in scope (unlike the patent-a-rectangle nature of the opposition). If this stupidity ever stops, then millions of dollars, euro, or Won that are being spent on lawyers might actually go into the innovation that patents are meant to promote. Who knows where that might lead?"
Bug

Linux Kernel Developer Declares VirtualBox Driver "Crap" 357

An anonymous reader writes "Linux kernel developers have decided to mark the VirtualBox kernel driver as tainted crap for the significant number of problems this open-source driver has caused. The VirtualBox kernel driver reportedly causes memory corruption and other problems. With the driver being flagged as tainted crap, bug reports caused by the driver will be taken less seriously."

Comment Re:Can you clarify something for me? (Score 1) 219

Utilizing VMs relates to power consumption specifically because aggregating a physical machine into a virtual one reduces power consumption. Why pay for idle CPU cycles on two machines when one will suffice? If both machines are being utilized you have an excellent argument to keep them both, but it falls apart when the machines are largely idle. We're in the scope of the lazy weekend sysadmin at home, so of course these machines all run only sporadically.

As for multiple human bodies using a machine simultaneously - of course you are correct only one physical human can access the GUI of a machine at a time. But between network access and the time honored tradition of "waiting" and "sharing", it's pretty reasonable for 2 or even 3 people to maintain separate user profiles on a system and just swap between them.

Even that said, it's completely realistic on Linux systems to supply an additional video card, assign a different session ID to it, and have two monitors, two keyboards, and two mice, all working simultaneously and without regard for the other. I've seen community libraries with 4 of these on a single computer.

Slashdot Top Deals

I think there's a world market for about five computers. -- attr. Thomas J. Watson (Chairman of the Board, IBM), 1943

Working...