Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:What's the gun equlvalent of a longbow ... (Score 1) 513

Any high-quality, high-powered long-barreled rifle can hit a target around a mile away.

Not even remotely correct. Sure, the maximum range of *some* rifle cartridges might reach or exceed 1000yds, but for the most part, the majority off the shelf modern rifle cartridges have a maximum effective range of 600-800yds. (eg: hitting what is being aimed at)

To get beyond beyond 1000yds effective range, you're looking at carts like the .338 Lapua, the .416 Barrett, and the .50BMG. Hardly what would be considered 'off the shelf'. And certainly not in untrained hands.

As a US Marine, I did train to hit targets out to 500yds (600yds for competition) with the a 5.56 out of an M-16 with a 20" barrel - iron sights. While I could get the rounds in the bull at that distance, only the best could get consistent center mass (5V) hits.

I sincerely doubt anyone 'off the street' could pickup an AR and hit the broad side of a barn at 200yds - maybe even 100yds - without a lot of training.

m

Comment Re:What's more fuel efficient? (Score 1) 209

What's more fuel efficient: everyone takes their own vehicle around town to various stores for shopping, or one truck goes to a warehouse to shop, then drives a route hitting all the houses in the neighborhood?

No, that's irrelevant, and it doesn't conform to the narrative. You see, you're supposed to feel bad that you have this lifestyle. That's why /. editorializes so outrageously in the headlines.

What you should be doing is looking in the mirror and chastising yourself vehemently. Then, after you've shouted yourself hoarse, grab the nearest environmentally friendly non-leather belt, and lash yourself at least 10 times.

Serves you right, you elitist bastard... You make me ill.

m

Comment Re:Bad Sensor (Score 1) 182

I would not fly a plane that had an automatic system that I could not override, and I consider it a crime to even sell tickets for such a beast.

So, no Airbus for you, right? Unless the aircraft is in direct law, it's *always* under some type of automated control.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_control_modes/

m

Comment Re:Hyundai Kona Electric (Score 1) 265

No, a SUV is a large vehicle built on a truck frame.

Not really. Might have been true ~20 years ago. Today, I believe the only truck framed SUVs still available new are the Toyota 4Runner and the truck based Suburban (and derivatives), the Expedition, and some Jeeps.

Everything else is unibody. Pickups are still body on frame due to towing capacity.

m

Comment Re:Fake news and censorship, it is all so tiresome (Score 1) 443

"Was /. always this moronic or is it just nostalgic memories clouding my view?"

No, it is significantly worse now, since BeauHD and msmash became the primary editors following the latest change in ownership. And I went out of my way to sign on for this comment, just so people could see my five-digit ID and understand what I mean when I say I remember what Slashdot used to be like.

But if it weren't for /., where would you get your daily 'the sky is falling, we're all going to die 8 degrees hotter!' news?

...sigh

m

Comment Re:Interesting question (Score 1) 196

Nobody minds them shooting birds with shotguns...

Birdshot has far less range than a rifle bullet. I doubt the shot even exceeds the outer perimeter of the airfield. A rifle bullet, on the other hand, would be lethal out to ~1500 yards[0], and probably capable of traveling considerably farther.[1]

Shooting drones with rifles is an exceptionally difficult task, and exceptionally dangerous...

m

0. Or meters, go be pedantic somewhere else

1. Calibre dependent, of course

Comment Facebook hired non-democrats! Great! Scott! (Score 4, Insightful) 102

Which does that fit under? News for nerds or 'stuff that matters'?

All /. is good for now are editorialized political posts masquerading as 'news', global warming/climate change stories, and the socialist ramblings about Bad Capitalism(tm).

This place peaked with SCO and Groklaw...

m

Comment Re:That's part of the problem. (Score 4, Insightful) 590

My dad made homemade wine for decades. Never over-consumed. Profited no one. His consumption was as close to balanced as it gets. But the thing is, his wine tasted awful...because alcohol tastes awful. In every single form. Not to see this is to lie to yourself.

No, it tastes awful to you...

I enjoy many types of alcoholic beverages just fine, as do the vast majority or people. If it were truly that bad, and people had to lie to themselves to 'enjoy' it, alcohol consumption would be a fringe affectation.

Stop projecting your experiences on others; It's annoying and smacks of virtue signaling.

m

Comment Re:Jail Zuckerberg or destroy Facebook (Score 1) 155

But look, it *is* just an internet company. No one HAS to join or participate in FB, it is voluntary.....and you are generally free to tell too much about yourself on there for others to see

At face value that's a true statement. Realistically, more people use FB than are aware of that fact. I use NoScript, and most pages I visit have a FB script running[0]... well, trying to run. I block that shite.

How many 'just plain folks', not on FB, and not using a script blocker/tracker blocker have data about their web habits on FB?

I doubt we'll ever know the true extent of FB tracking...

m

[0] To be fair, *lots* of companies piggyback scripts and trackers, so FB isn't alone in this creepy regard.

Submission + - The Astonishingly High Administrative Costs of U.S. Health Care (nytimes.com)

schwit1 writes: It takes only a glance at a hospital bill or at the myriad choices you may have for health care coverage to get a sense of the bewildering complexity of health care financing in the United States. That complexity doesn’t just exact a cognitive cost. It also comes with administrative costs that are largely hidden from view but that we all pay.

Because they’re not directly related to patient care, we rarely think about administrative costs. They’re high.

A widely cited study published in The New England Journal of Medicine used data from 1999 to estimate that about 30 percent of American health care expenditures were the result of administration, about twice what it is in Canada. If the figures hold today, they mean that out of the average of about $19,000 that U.S. workers and their employers pay for family coverage each year, $5,700 goes toward administrative costs.

A distinguishing feature of the American health system is that it offers a lot of choice, including among health plans. Because insurers and public programs have not coordinated on a set of standards for pricing, billing and collection — whatever the benefits of choice — one of the consequences is high administrative burden. And that’s another reason for high American health care prices.

Slashdot Top Deals

In any formula, constants (especially those obtained from handbooks) are to be treated as variables.

Working...