Comment Re:But what system does he suggest instead? (Score 1) 308
You completely misunderstand what this is about. The problem is that productivity is measured in number of publications, regardless of quality of said publications. Anything that can scape by the reviewers, often in a 3rd or 4th attempt counts. The guy that gets all his stuff published on the first attempt, because it is actually good, does not stand a chance, because he will never get the numbers.
The problem is that low quality publications actually represent negative productivity.
There have been alternative methods to quantitatively assess qualitative measurements. If it were possible, I like to think we'd be doing it.