Comment Re:Enough time? (Score 0, Redundant) 238
I was thinking exactly that. I guess if you see the cop coming and reach into your pocket quickly for your phone it might work. What could possibly go wrong?
Errr... a bullet in the head?
I was thinking exactly that. I guess if you see the cop coming and reach into your pocket quickly for your phone it might work. What could possibly go wrong?
Errr... a bullet in the head?
no, it's not just about getting an unblurry image. But to get one you have to know a little how to get such picture. thats why pictures which are not digitally processed with Photoshop (or Gimp, whatever) are the best. Thats my opinion, maybe yours different because you shot many blurred photos, then yeah.. why not. Have fun.
Spoken like one who takes a few shots here and there, and declares himself a photographer, capable of determining what is best for the entire field. A person who makes such sweeping comments about a field as diverse as photography, is at best ignorant. You'll also find that most professional photographers (as in, it's their profession and they get paid to do it) agree that there is a level of processing that is acceptable in photoshop, even for newsprint where the standard is very high. Writing off Photoshop entirely is like a carpenter who refuses to use a nailgun because "real men drive nails in with a hammer".
Thats all true. Real men use hammers, not nailguns.
Successful and fortunate crime is called virtue. - Seneca