I thought that RLS had been banned in the US? Clinical trials showed that it had potentially dangerous side effects, such as questioning authority.

If they don't pass legislation, why would lobbyists keep paying them?

This claim is, at best, controversial. Some people say that Rosalind's lab partner Maurice Wilkins gave her unpublished work to Watson and Crick without her permission; Watson and Crick say that it was in fact officially released by King's College. I'm not aware that Franklin herself ever stated that she had been robbed. Wilkins was included in the Nobel prize; presumably Franklin would have been also had she still been alive.

Since Nasuni is a storage vendor, it makes sense that they are benchmarking cloud storage rather than cloud compute.

I think you need to balance risks. If my mail is hosted outside my home, on my ISP or on Google, then it increases the risk of it being searched by the government without my knowledge. If I set up and run my own mail server on my own machine, then I need to correctly install and configure the OS and mail server and keep up with all the security patches and spam filters, or I severely risk having my mail accessed by script kiddies without my knowledge. Or maybe I will know about it because they'll reset passwords to all my other accounts and then delete my mail.

If given a choice between exposing my mail to government crooks or free enterprise crooks, I'll take the government.

Sovereign nations don't often let other countries dictate their policies, but they quite often listen to what other countries have to say about them. The article does not say that the US threatened the EC, it just says that the US is lobbying the EC. If one country is proposing to do something that another affects the interests of another country, the latter can and should lobby the former. Foreign companies and governments lobby the US government on a regular basis, this is just the reciprocal of that.

In the US, people have certain rights to their image that are not based in copyright. The person in the picture does not own the copyright, but they still have the right to control commercial use of the photo.

I'm having trouble finding technical information about this design, and I'm curious how much of the motherboard logic has to move onto this daughterboard. For example, is memory still on the main board? If so, an x8 PCIe channel doesn't seem adequate.

You carry a spare serpentine belt with you whenever you drive? That's hardcore.

I was kind of hoping that their plans for permanent disposal involved putting all the CDs in a pile and blowing them up with explosives. Or maybe using them for a skeet shoot. They could have sold tickets to that to make up for the gift certificates they were giving out.

While those hosting a private data center will have little use for this scrubbin' simian

I don't see why this isn't useful to anyone running dynamic virts; whether on private or public infrastructure. I assume the code as released depends on the Amazon API, but as long as similar functions exist in your private cloud API, it should be possible to adapt the software.

This would make email attachments and any other file upload kind of a pain. Before you can open a file in the browser, you have to copy it to your browser's sandbox using an external tool.

I can see that a 70kg TV would make an excellent home defense system. Just suspend it above the door and rig it to fall on anyone who opens the door without disarming the trap first.

The police don't care how many iphones she wanted to buy. The store owner didn't like it, and ordered her out of the store. The police were enforcing the store's right to remove someone from the store's property.

I wish they would just say something like "Of course we are spying on the French president. We spy on everyone, friend and foe alike. That's our job. And if you aren't spying on us then you should fire your incompetent intelligence staff and find better ones."