It's a personality test not a technical test, the technically correct answer tells the interviewer nothing about the person's character. The SQL question is just an example of a point where a bullshitter would likely start trying to fake their level of knowledge. It's not hard to do if the interviewer knows the subject, simply keep thinking up questions based on trivial information you have had to look up in the recent past. I've used the same technique in the past when hiring C programmers. Most times it takes less than five minutes to find some esoteric trivia that the prospect does not know off the top off their head, how they handle not knowing will clearly separate the confident (and knowledgeable) professional from the cowboys.

Also get it done early in the interview, no good wasting everyone's time if they fail the "arrogance test".

I've used the same technique myself, it's a very effective way to screen out bullshitters.

"Running gag" is a shame, they really were pioneers in the search engine business. For me the switch to Google was simply because it had (and still has) an uncluttered interface.

Ex taxi driver from Australia - happy hookers were the norm here 25yrs ago, AFAICT they still are. I must have had at least a couple of hundred strippers/hookers in my cab during the 3yrs I was driving and I concur "I don't think I ever even heard a hard luck story more than this or that girl had a BF that was an asshole.". Probably helps that brothels, strip clubs, and private escorts are all legal businesses over here, they pay their rates and taxes just like everyone else, they must be licensed and are subjected to regular health checks. From a purely logical POV the fact they may be asked to do something they find unpleasant is no different to asking a plumber to clean out a septic tank. While on the subject of pleasure most taxi drivers would rather transport a hooker, stripper, athlete, cat in a cage, in preference to a social snob in a suit. In my experience young drunken women in groups of 3 or more are amongst the worst behaved passengers and seeing-eye dogs are amongst the best.

Making sexual entertainment a crime simply gives real criminals the chains to enslave sex workers. Accepting the fact that sexual entertainment is a universal human behavior and regulating it ensures the public health problem is controlled, that society benefits in the form of taxes, and (most importantly) it ensures workers can demand the legal protections afforded to other workers in their society without fear of being prosecuted themselves. Organized criminals and corrupt cops long ago lost the keys to a sex workers jail cell in Melbourne and that's a GoodThing(TM). You'd think the same reasoning would have enough force to pull their heads out of their arses and do the same for *recreational drugs, but alas they are too busy banning water pipes and playing legislative "wack-a-mole" with "legal highs".

*Hard drugs: such as heroine and crack may "enslave" some sex workers but from what I've seen junkies are uncommon in Melbourne's regulated sex industry. Although there are some well known spots where they do try and (illegally) pimp themselves on the street without the requisite license, these are mainly frequented by a tiny minority of people who actually enjoy a $50 blow job in a public toilet, like beggars they are considered a public nuisance but in reality most are simply drug/alcohol fucked or handicapped by a mental illness/deficiency.

A basic freedom is missing from western society, consenting adults should be the masters of their own bodies to the point where the effect on others goes beyond a purely emotional offense to the mind of the observer (eg: non-custodial punishment to enforce mass vaccinations, jail for using your body to murder/rape/etc).

Yes, this is a non-story in Australia.

No, the incompetence of the Australian voter will be responsible for that. However numerous polls also show that the majority of voters would have preferred to be choosing from Rudd vs Turner. Turner leads the traditional side of conservative politics, the side that still has some principles and common respect for their ideological opponents.

The fundamental problem in Oz is that the mining unions are pulling the strings in the Labor party and the mine owners are pulling the strings in the Liberal party, and Murdoch controls 70% of the press. On many subjects the union and the bosses are in lockstep agreement, eg: the unionists ousted Rudd because of his mining tax plans, their bosses ousted Turner because of his plans to regulate carbon emissions. Neither the union leaders or mine owners want anything to get in the way of digging holes in the ground, everybody seems to have forgotten about Tony's prediction of economic Armageddon, the carbon tax was instituted a year ago and we are still one of the healthiest economies on the planet.

Disclaimer: I believe we should exploit our resources but not at the cost of our natural life support systems, for instance coal mines on cape york are potentially a threat to the great barrier reef. The reef is not only a valuable tourist attraction it is also a massive fish nursery, The shelf waters around Australia's coast are the breeding ground for much of the southern hemisphere's fisheries, the planetary food web is not something you can put a price on, it's essential natural infrastructure that (if given a chance) is so productive it allows some of us enough time to do things like dig massive holes and sell magic rocks to China.

Yep, it's rare for people to actually have to pay the fine, however we consistently get 90+% of voters turning up to a state/federal election which is a GoodThing(TM).

Are you wrefering to my fwwriend Biggus Dickus?

Banks pay "insurance" to the federal reserve, it's a chunk of money they must deposit at reserve interest rates. The amount of imaginary money they can loan to people is determined by the size of that chunk of money. Should the whole thing go tits up the fed uses that money (and more) to prop the system up (bailouts). Certainly not an ideal state of affairs but the alternative of "let them fail" doesn't explain how the economy is rebuilt after the banking system collapses and the rioting has subsided.

However bitcoin claims to be a currency, not a bank. The problem there is that in the not so distant past certain business owners paid their workers in a currency that could only be spent at the "company store". Bitcoin also gives a much better return for money laundering than paying a bunch petty criminals to wash it by hand at the slot machines.

Personally I think if they don't want to be part of the public banking system then they should stop promoting it as a currency and start pretending it's virtual bling, start by posting the exchange rate in grams of gold or number of IPV4 addresses it can rent, rather than $US.

With all the corrupt and inhumane shit that goes on in the world why do you people attack science based public health measures that have been in use for over half a century and clearly shown to work as advertised? What's the fucking point of protesting one of the few policies that governments get right on a daily basis?

No, it's much more satisfying to rape you until you beg me to forgive your disrespect.

Brave maybe, but the "awesomeness" of blogging about it is likely to backfire. It is unwise to publicly accuse someone of something as serious as attempted rape and not make a formal complaint to police. It's also unwise to blog about it until after the Judge has finished hammering his desk.

For the last couple of decades it's been virtually impossible to start work on a major engineering project without running all sorts of simulations, on the whole it has been a GoodThing(TM). Like engineers, advisers won't go away just because they have new tools, they will simply give more sophisticated advice but no matter what level of technology the advisers use, you need public servants that are not afraid to "speak truth to power". James Hansen is a good example of that type of public servant from the US, however facts alone cannot sway dishonest politicians such as James Inhofe. Where are the people who wanted to charge Clinton with treason for lying about a blow job? - Why aren't they baying for the blood of the habitual liars such as Inhofe who demonstrate on a daily basis they have zero respect for the high office they hold?

It's a very narrow definition of intelligence that assumes it must manifest itself as human like thought. An ants nest is an intelligent and efficient entity in it's own right but it doesn't have any thought processes, ant's themselves are basically mindless automatons, They don't think about the complexities of building nests they just do it, some species such as soldier ants build the ant equivalent of NYC every few days, shifting up to four tons of soil at a time. The octopus is another fine example, obviously a highly intelligent creature (can solve the "screw top lid" puzzle faster than any ape except man) but it's brain is nothing like that of a mammal. It has no left/right hemispheres and the neurons are distributed along it's arms rather than concentrated in a central organ.

Machines can now learn from weakly structured and contradictory data sources such as pages on the net and answer trivia questions better than humans (re: IBM;s Watson). To me this indicates we already have AI that surpasses the logical (left hemisphere) of human intelligence, our right hemisphere is the "in the moment" intelligence that we share with the Octopus, computers simply don't have the scale of sensory input that our right hemisphere thrives on and until they do their "thought processes" will rely on an artificial "right hemisphere" (such as whatever if finds on the internet). That doesn't mean it won't appear to have human like responses, after all most duck hunters know how to imitate a duck.

Agree, data mining is about finding relationships you didn't know existed but the Obama campaign is not a great example of that. I have .au at the end of my email address because...well...I live in Oz. Somehow Obama's super computer got hold of my address, miss-identified me as an American voter and started trying to sell me tickets to their convention, at first they were signed by various mayors and governors, then Michell. and finally Barrack in a last ditch attempt to extract $5 from me. Not spotting the .au makes me think their last effort was not a great deal more sophisticated than simply spamming commercially available email lists.

Someone else who doesn't recognize the significance of developments such as IBM's Watson.