i'd say you're very close minded to not realize that it depends on everything.

to help you: my mother came from a family of 10 in a 3 bedroom house... lots of stories about eating fast and sharing beds. she had 3 children, as did almost all of her siblings except 2... 1 had 1, 1 had 0. i'm not ashamed that i had my own room growing up, and always had more than i wanted to eat. my wife is pregnant.

a coward indeed.

wow, you are bad at logic. they MOST DEFINITELY will have the average number of kids on average... BECAUSE IT'S THE AVERAGE.

now do some research and let me know the average number of children had grouped by number of siblings... then you can start talking about something relevant.

including the original poster... is 19 kids in 1 generation really that much worse than 4 kids each over 5 generations at earlier and earlier ages of reproduction?

if i grew up with 18 brothers and sisters, the last thing i would want for my children would probably be a similar environment... those 19 kids and counting all might choose to not have ANY children.

..... FO drizzle... FO.

understanding their inability to maintain defense against a virus/worm/malware pool growing exponentially and causing their product to all but render a home PC useless, they attempt to reach the hearts and minds of the people causing that pool to grow.

i have a feeling this marketing ploy will function as good as anything else from norton.

.... duh?

i don't feel squashed...

since when does youtube allow you to search for objects in videos? youtube search works off keywords and the title and description of the video... it's pretty obvious you don't understand what this new project is intending to do.

sounds like it would be crazy not to stop them...

.... no idea what you're talking about.

so being a geek is laying down and doing whatever the media tells you to do...

the tag line on the site suggests this is a "nerd" site however, and fighting oppression with force certainly does matter.

however the REAL point of my argument that you obviously missed, busy doing whatever geeks do, was: THE MEDIA IS NOT IN CONTROL.

for the level of processing required, $11M will barely cover the hardware infrastructure

so it's "+5 insightful" to imply journalists are in control of the populace, but suggesting the populace is not under their control is "-1 Flamebait"...

pretty obvious who is in control of this website.

slashdot = stagnated.