Comment Excellent (Score 2) 113
No problem with this whatsoever. It's just the flip side of at-will employment, which I also have no problem with.
No problem with this whatsoever. It's just the flip side of at-will employment, which I also have no problem with.
This. That would be awesome.
If LLMs are increasing your productivity, you must be among the worst developers on the planet.
lol!
"Keyboards, pssh. Kids today
It's funny watching the reactions to things like this. It really reveals the religious nature of it all.
"Say what?? We can't actually mitigate things with technology
It's true. LLMs can't code. All they can produce is text that looks like code, just like any other text the produce. They lack the ability to consider, reason, and analyze. This is an indisputable fact.
Try not to take sensationalist headlines at face value just because they affirm your silly delusions.
My silly delusion that LLMs are a useful tool, that I, a working programmer, actually do use productively? Okay
Noticed that as well, the quality of the output depends on the quality of the input. And you have to know something about the subject the output is about to know whether is good or garbage (or look at it period and not put blind faith in its output). We've seen it with lawyers using it for arguments then not double checking the cases. Sometimes AI just makes up stuff.
Right, it's a tool. In the right hands, it is super useful.
Haven't bought a tablet for quite a few years, do they normally use SIM cards now?
(If so, what makes it a tablet vs. a "big phone"?)
I saw that, but no idea what it means.
Looks like there are some docs on this. This one may be relevant.
Certain topics do not lend themselves very well to the scientific method.
It's kind of hard to set up 100 universes, say, and run them through a few billion years. You can't do the experiment part.
What does the build process do that doesn't produce the exact same bits every time?
I'm guessing it has to do with "sans the likes of embedded signatures".
... did none of the devastated women (quoted in the story) pony up the missing 5% of the org's budget then?
Or if they were never asked, why were they never asked?
I know y'all like using 1984 as a manual, but you don't have to follow it so exactly.
(Although, limiting it to only two minutes would be nice.)
You can't go after people who claim to live in one of their extra homes for tax purposes but in reality are cheating the people of your state! That's so unfair, they might have to sell one of their vacation homes or even their yacht!
"The rich" = "people who have more than I do".
Most people posting here would be considered "the rich" by Joe Democrat.
Envy is the fuel that engine runs on.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. - Andy Finkel, computer guy
