Like Firefox?

In Australia we havent even got decent dataplans, its all between 20Mb to 500Mb. The 1Gb & 2GB plans are hideously expensive.

I would love to be Windows free but until Steam is ported to Linux (and my games collection on Steam, which will never happen) I will retain a Windows 'gamer' machine.

Its a trap!
- Admiral Ackbar

Sounds like SAP, not just on mainframe but how it uses Oracle on x86 hardware too.

Boobs maybe not, after all if your child is 4, it would have only been a few years (maybe 3.5 years) since he had direct access to them anyway.

However, Goatse, Tubgirl, 2 Girs 1 Cup and /b/ can traumatize adults let alone kids. Supervision is the best key. Leaving a 4 year old alone with direct internet access is not something I would consider wise

I agree with parent. The latter sentence is implying there hasn't been a carnivorous mammal discovered in 24 years at all and if that is not the case then it should specify "in Madagascar"

Except my bike can make it to the mall in less than 12 parsecs!
Wait...

It gets worse, during the discovery process it was found that Viacom were uploading their works using sock accounts and then threatening YouTube with legal action saying they were put up there illegally. Is the balance he was talking about "balanced 100% in favor of media companies no matter what they do" view?

No, the Viacom vs YouTube ruling was fair, especially considering internal memos admitted that the "illegal uploading" was done by Viacom themselves.

I thought not even the RIAA could justify Viacom's side of this case.

Bit of a pickle, last time I checked OSX doesn't support ext4 while Linux doesn't support ZFS (except with FUSE which I dont reccomend in a produciton environment) which would be my 2 options for performance. I know UFS is in both so that could work but I am curious if OSX can support XFS.

If you could find a driver for ext4 on OSX I would reccomend that: its fast & proven to be quite stable, next best thing would be XFS.

I find it ammusing that this "gimmick" that you refer to looks exactly like a Wii MotionPlus and a nunchuck. At least Microsoft is being origional in their approach. Its also ammusing that you have to fork out $180 for the full experience per player for the 1:1 motion control that has existed for a year thats an optional pack in for games that support it.

Except for the fact that console sales the Wii dominates not only in America but Japan, Europe and Australia too. The entire purpose of the Wii was for a cheap, simple, easy console for a more casual audience: and it has worked. The PS3 is still too overpriced for casual gamers and the 360 is too much of a hardcore system Move & Kintect being the big causal push could be overpriced as well if the US$149 price point turns out to be correct for Kinect and to play all Move games you need to shell out $180 (Camera, 2 Move controllers and a nunchuck varient). The Wii is a causal audience system with a few gem games for the core. 360 and PS3 players (and especially fanboys) are not the same type of people that have a Wii as their only system.

Another thing about the Wii is its titles are focused on local multiplayer as opposed to online, which is why its usually popular at parties. The PSP failed because of a focus on scaling down console experiences onto a handheld, which was never the appeal of portable gaming. The reason why the DS (and now iPhone too) kicked its butt is because the experiences were small bite sized types suitable for a handheld. The main issue with the PSP was there wern't enough games like Patapon and too many games like God of War which is something Sony obviously still dont get. One thing I dont like about the PSP is its control layout. They should have either done a touch screen or at the least a 2nd analouge nub (Katamari PSP would have been awesome with either).

Maybe I am fortunate to have all 3 consoles and both handhelds (not iPhone, I chose to go down the Android path there). Each system has its different strenghts and weaknesses and I am fortunate that having them all have allowed me to have some perspective and not be such a fanboy (my fanboyism days died the day the Dreamcast died)

Wikipedia is about facts devoid of oppinion. The sort of ideologues are the sort you can find on Conservapedia like creationist arguments that fail to stand proper scrutiny under the scientific method.

While we are on the subject: why is "liberal bias" anything that does not include a conservative bias? Pages shouldnt be locked but vandal IP addresses should still be blocked. At the end of the day oppinions should be stated as oppinions not facts and so far Wikipedia despite not being "balanced" (whatever that term means) it is neutral which is how information should be presented.

Goatse has a long history of exposing gaping holes

The thought was that SCO sued IBM hoping that IBM would buy them out.