Submission + - Terrorist flies around no-fly list. (reuters.com)
This whole mess, and the thousands preceding it, begs one big question. How far does big brother have to go to actually make us safe? And at what point can we say it isn't working?
You should test your theory in the name of SCIENCE!!
Spoiler: you're wrong.
Take control? Yes, take control of a situation. Yes, they have guns. So do I. So do a lot of people.
Cops are trained to control a situation, if cop killings are rare, maybe this training has something to do with it?
I know you're enlightened and all, heck I've been saying "acquiesce" ever since I saw Pirates of the Caribbean too; but the dude was Canadian. He isn't standing up to fascism by arguing with a law enforcement officer from a different nation. His place is to say, "thanks for letting me enter your country, even if I have to wait in my car."
Sounds poetic, but ignores the special groups that love to break the rule, "don't get into fights where you don't stand a chance."
1. Drunks
2. Druggies
3. People that feel entitled (like, oh, a Canadian crossing the U.S. border and arguing with an officer.)
4. Kids
5. Other
Tally them all up, and it's no longer a rare case.
Perhaps a crooked judge or republican?
I guess everything is partisan.
You can build a million bridges, but if you F just one sheep...
Volume/speed? That's a useless metric. What's inside your cubic centimeter (notice the spelling, I get double points for mocking your science and english)?
What if I need stupid served after 11?
Who cares about popups, now we have a standardized scrabble dictionary!
Our current strategy it to shoot them. If their blood is green, they were Taliban.
In order to achieve the highest efficiency, we keep the same instructions loaded on 47 of the processors, and reserve the full bus for the 48th.
Like the e-mails say, we need to beef up our conclusions for a big public splash.
Based on the correlation between heat and atmospheric CO2, I'd guess an alternate theory would be that temperature affects the rates of plant respiration and photosynthesis to net a greater output of CO2 than O2.
Actually, it's ridiculous to believe that scientists have done their due diligence. Science is not a belief system. The scientific method requires rigorous scrutiny, not your kind of blind faith. Being told that thousands of scientists have reached consensus is not science.
GP asked some very good questions. Answering them would give credibility, ad hominem will only get you mod points.
System going down in 5 minutes.