Comment Re:slashvertisement (Score 1) 81
Did you accidentally the whole thing or was it on purpose?
Comment Re:Received one this morning. (Score 1) 180
My wife received one of these from USBank on Apr 3. I have not received anything.
Comment Date disasters (Score 3, Funny) 135
"the Slashdot archives bear witness to date disasters"
Of course the they do. This is slashdot.
Of course the they do. This is slashdot.
Journal Journal: Blank
Scoop?
Comment Re:Not just with video games, but in general (Score 1) 465
Aw crap I thought you were setting up a joke, "under Bush". NM.
Comment Re:Not just with video games, but in general (Score 1) 465
If this happenned under Bush...
...then it wouldn't be congressmen with GUYS in the bathroom!
Comment Re:This is embarrassing for Apple (Score 1) 315
As long as it meats those criteria Apple will still have the consumers that it dose currently have.
Aren't they mostly vegetarians?
Comment Re:So who is he really? (Score 1) 586
That comment was made by his roommate or something. The guy they tracked was just an acquaintance to the other guy that made the comment. That's why they were tracking this first guy. Totally makes sense!
Comment Re:No need to break what isn't broken (Score 1) 408
The whole reason for corporate personhood is to protect the rights of the people involved with the corporation.
IANAL but isn't this the main reason for the entity called "corporation" to exist? I mean that isn't this the reason to incorporate, so that the person (human) is legally seperate from the company? Or is it just for tax purposes?
Comment Re:Just great... (Score 1) 206
Like this?
Comment Re:I don't usually complain about summaries (Score 5, Funny) 157
Haha...Palmela Handerson?
Comment Re:Palindrome (Score 1) 486
One ring to rule them all
Ok, so we now only have to find out what the 1 in the middle means
But you answered it! It's how many rings!
Comment Re:Awesome (Score 1) 322
And you shouldn't a whole freaking cabinet level department to hand out Pell Grants.
I think you accidentally out a whole word.
Need.
Comment Re:So they can just keep stolen property then? (Score 1) 340
Yea you're right. It's also possible that the company might have wanted the "new" owners to jump through some hoops (maybe they had to allow that company to disclose their info to the "old" owner) and they figured it's not worth it, we'll just keep the dog." Either way, it seems as if "new" owners didn't try more than a minimum amount (if at all) to return the dog. Like Adustust said, dick move.
Comment Re:So they can just keep stolen property then? (Score 2, Insightful) 340
Maybe the new owners tried to get the previous owner's info and were faced with the same dilemma (disclosure of personal information of the previous owner) and they decided to just keep the dog?
