Comment Re:So it's a fnacy nmae (Score 1) 1345
Multiplication also has a geometric definition.
Multiplication also has a geometric definition.
Your dad's hard physical labor probably had the opposite effect on his youthful appearance than you think it had. He probably stayed looking young not despite, but because of the labor. I (and other people that I have spoken to) find that people who do physical labor for a living stay looking younger than people that do "desk" work. After all, exercise is generally considered the closest thing to a fountain of youth that we have yet found.
The phrase that is heard quite often in my office is, "You can make numbers say anything!"
Numbers don't lie and neither do statistics. A more accurate appraisal would be "You can make ignorant and naive people believe anything."
It will suck, obviously. After all, it's a lolly..
.. do we learn nothing from SimCity?
-r
Sorry, fresh out of godzillas.
The guy is doing time in prison because he had to "warn the attacker that he is going to shoot, then shoot in to the air".
Over here, having the gun in your hand is warning enough, and shooting in the air is a misdemeanor, I think. You're only supposed to shoot the target.
calling for proportional response just isn't fair for the defender because he doesn't have time to prepare the "proportional" weapon and many times that is just impossible.
All your examples are proportional: all it means is that you don't shoot someone unless you are in imminent danger of life/serious injury.
How am I with my 62kg and some arcane knowledge of taekwon-do going to suddenly defend against 90+kg guy with only my bare hands and legs?
With a gun or knife. Tae Kwon Do is a sport.
I mean, the theory is so full of holes you could drive aircraft carrier through them.
It's not a theory, it's a doctrine.
Really, the BSA has never been more than a minor annoyance in the background. Noisy and irritating, but hardly threatening for most people.
The RIAA (and MPAA) are proving that they're willing to punish people for ten times their annual livelihood, even when not guilty. That is enough to make them a danger to everyone, and thus much more reviled.
I'm quoting WP but it would be easy to find other sources -- I studied that in highschool, so it's not exactly rocket science:
Monetarism today is mainly associated with the work of Milton Friedman, who was among the generation of economists to accept Keynesian economics and then criticize it on his own terms. Friedman and Anna Schwartz wrote an influential book, Monetary History of the United States 1867-1960, and argued that "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon." Friedman advocated a central bank policy aimed at keeping the supply and demand for money at equilibrium, as measured by growth in productivity and demand. The monetarist argument that the demand for money is a stable function gained considerable support during the late 1960s and 1970s from the work of David Laidler. The former head of the United States Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, is generally regarded as monetarist in his policy orientation. The European Central Bank officially bases its monetary policy on money supply targets.
Critics of monetarism include both neo-Keynesians who argue that demand for money is intrinsic to supply, and some conservative economists who argue that demand for money cannot be predicted. Joseph Stiglitz has argued that the relationship between inflation and money supply growth is weak when inflation is low.
You're saying Milton Friedman is a keynesianist. That's just fucking retarded. Or you're trolling, but since people have upvoted you, I have to assume some people are misguided enough to believe this ridiculous bullshit.
Uhm, in non-trivial slice of your examples that would be not C, but Ada.
Its 2010
Is that you, John Titor?
When it is incorrect, it is, at least *authoritatively* incorrect. -- Hitchiker's Guide To The Galaxy