Comment Re:stupid idea (Score 1) 168
They had bigger problems in 1940. That doesn't mean this wasn't still a problem.
And who do you think is going to pay for hiring those additional people? Hint: it's not coming out of the CEO's bonus, that's for sure.
The business will still be paying the same hourly rate. The employees that are dropping down from 40 hours to 32 hours will get paid less. The total cost to the business will remain the same (ignoring training costs for the new hires etc).
But the Washington Post reports dozens of food manufacturers are now "claiming the new standards are draconian and will result in most current food products not making the cut
That's kind of the point. If it's not healthy it shouldn't be branded as healthy. Food has too much sugar.
The proposed rule, if finalized, they said, would violate the First Amendment rights of food companies and could harm both consumers and manufacturers. The Sugar Association has an issue with the added sugar limit
Unhealthy food harms consumers. And of course the Sugar Association would have an issue with the sugar limit, just as tobacco companies had issues when governments started cracking down on that.
He estimated that about half of the customers his team talks to are able to easily move to OpenJDK
If we're talking weight (as all too many SI users insist is the only right and proper way of doing things) then we should be talking mega-newtons...
It makes no sense to measure by weight in a micro-g environment.
Perry shot back that "what's kept out by walled gardens is fraudsters and pornsters and hackers and malware and spyware and foreign governments..."
So... it doesn't keep out local governments? And what's so bad about "pornsters" anyway?
And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions. -- David Jones
