Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:bcache is a HUGE improvement for some workloads (Score 1) 190

EnchanceIO is an alternate ssd caching solution for linux. It's a kernel module that can be setup against any existing FS and can be attached/removed even whilst the FS is mounted. Supports writeback/writethrough and a bunch of cache replacement algorithms.

Well, I used teh google and found out that it's a commercial product but that it's also open source. Actually, it's Free Software, apparently GPLv2.

So what I get from this is that this is basically dm-cache as a module. Yes? Hmm, either I need to install more deps, or this isn't going to work on 3.11

Comment Re:Next, fix the desktop (Score 1) 190

Not only is the kernel never done, but the GUI is worked on by completely different people. I don't know the name of your logical fallacy, but I like to call it the GNOME and KDE fallacy in nerdland. If all those people just worked on one DE, it would be great right? No, it would suck horribly. Too many cooks with their own ideas. But you're even farther off the mark because you want people who like to write kernel code to write application code. That's like asking a cabinet maker to build you a house... or asking an ordinary carpenter to build your cabinets. Either one can probably do the job, but they're specialized for a reason.

Comment Re:bcache is a HUGE improvement for some workloads (Score 1) 190

Bcache (merged in 3.10, btw) has one very big drawback for me. To prevent writing to the backing partition (your 'multi TB storage') outside of bcache you have to convert your those partitions to some bcache format that writes a custom superblock. As far as I can tell this conversion is one-way only and the tool to do it in-place (as opposed to format-and-restore-from-backup) is not supported by the bcache folks, although I may be wrong here.

This is precisely why I have not even tried to implement it, even just to see if it's good. This requirement is a complete non-starter, and I have never heard any technical reason why it is a necessity. Indeed, if the idea is to cache blocks, then you should be able to cache any kind of blocks. If that is unworkable within this architecture, the project should be thrown away and reinitiated by someone with some standards. Forcing a new format on users that won't be back-compatible with older kernels and distributions when it's not necessary is completely unacceptable.

Sad, though, because I really want what it does. Perhaps someday dm-cache will make it into mainline. It does what we want it to do, but it's not mainlined and it only appears for some kernel versions - looks like 3.0.8 is the latest.

Comment Re:tazer (Score 1) 208

if you plug 90V or so into the headphone jack, you might fry your seat's electronics only, or you might take out the whole entertainment system (and get your ass whupped shoebomber-style),

I see a whole lot of ego on slashdot. This post is a great example. How the fuck would you even know if someone plugged 90V into the headphone jack, to get up and kick their ass like the supreme badass you believe yourself to be?

Comment Re:So, time to scrap TSA/airport security checks (Score 1) 208

A popular opinion on slashdot. But naive.

A popular rebuttal on slashdot. But based on a logical fallacy.

Even while cumbersome I much prefer sitting in an airplane where people had to pass a check than one without. Honestly, what would be your preference?
You can bet that terrorists would find it an easy attack vector if there were no checks anymore.

Your logical fallacy is attacking a straw man. Nobody is calling for the elimination of security checks. We are calling for the elimination of the TSA, and the placement of security checks back in the hands of airlines and airports. The TSA has been shown to be more effective at being criminal than at catching them, and as such should be abolished as a cure worse than the disease.

Comment Re: Good Grief (Score 1) 248

Great. US style capitalism screws up pretty much everything it touches these days, and now one of those who've benefited from that wants to use public resources to give him private property.

Typical.

What other kind of economic environment do you want to live in? One where I simply take everything from you at gunpoint and then dribble back barely enough for you to live from day to day as my slave?

I read it as an assertion that this was an example of that kind of behavior.

Comment Re:No, but the Age of Information will. (Score 1) 90

If I can't get be post-paid for my work, hoping to build an audience and further fund my career, why would anyone know who I (or any other author) was in order to know if they wanted to pay them in advance? I couldn't wast time trying to become an author. Or a musician. Or painter.

You don't have to jump straight into writing books, or painting murals. You could begin with lesser works, and build a reputation.

Of course I have other options in this world. Since I have no legal protections for my work, I'm sure outfits will pop up offering to distribute it wrapped up so tight in DRM that piracy wouldn't be much of an issue.

They have to offer the work at a price which the customer is willing to pay, and the conditions are part of the payment. People are not going to dance the hokey pokey to see a movie. They'll see a different movie, or read a book, or fuck.

Comment Re:Fuck off (Score 1) 337

You steal my personal data, sell it to someone else who uses that data to commit crimes, you are a dangerous person.

That's not what most hackers do, though. Also, prison is for violent criminals. People who represent a clear, immediate danger to others. People who you can not deal with any way but murdering them or locking them up.

Comment Re:depends where you live (Score 1) 567

In some places there is no requirement for slower traffic to drive in the right hand lane.

I think you mean legal requirement. You're always required to drive in the non-passing lane lest you be an asshole. You're only legally required to let people pass in some places. And in most places, you won't get ticketed even if a cop has to pass you on the right.

Comment Re:How many humans does the farm require? (Score 1) 65

Both have problems. The first is pretty much laying the seeds of a violent revolution and causing misery for no good reason but the glorification of elites, many of whom will have done little more than inherited their status. The second would create a permanent hedonistic class with no need for education nor pride in the value of work

Uh, we have that already. I don't know if you've noticed, but you can live much better in this country on minimum wage than you can making the median wage in a lot of other countries. And we already have a bunch of people who do nothing in their spare time but watch shitty TV, drink shitty beer, and fuck. Sounds like low-level, low-brow hedonism to me. It requires neither education nor pride.

As long as people have to work for luxuries, some people will work.

Slashdot Top Deals

Chemist who falls in acid is absorbed in work.

Working...