Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 256 declined, 32 accepted (288 total, 11.11% accepted)

×
Encryption

Submission + - 3 Years in Jail for Web Protest and Encrypted Mail (democracynow.org)

twitter writes: "From the happy-independence-day-dept

Democracy Now has a scary interview with Andrew Stephanian. Andrew spent three years in jail for organizing animal rights protests on line. Five months of his incarceration were in a controversial new US prison system called a "Communications Management Unit" of CMU.

this war on dissent ... the evidence against him was essentially that he was associating with a website, didn't operate the website. [FBI wiretaps showed his decision and urging of others not to violate] civil injunctions that were imposed on certain demonstrations. ... the government alleges [encrypted email is] evidence of his criminal intent.

the journey that Andrew Stepanian has gone through is a frightening example of ... this incredible attempt by the government to envelop political activists, criminalize dissent, convict them and then send them to special housing units based on a political agenda.

Andrew's other dangerous activities include six years of feeding homeless people and rebuilding homes destroyed by Hurricane Katrina. I don't think limited software options were the main problem when state police labled dissidents, "terrorists" two years ago. The oppression of dissidence is systematic. It's time to get rid of these obnoxious and illegal surveillance systems and the cowardly laws that foist them on us."

Linux Business

Submission + - Munich Transition to Linux Doing Well. (h-online.com)

twitter writes: "Munich's move to GNU/Linux is moving along as planned and serves as a model to other government organizations.

Florian Schiessl, the acting head of the Munich LiMux project, says, "We'd do it again". ... The target is to convert 80 per cent of the city council's 14,000 computers to Linux by mid-2012 at the latest. ... by the end of this year in fact, all the town hall staff are to drop Word, Excel and Internet Explorer and use free OpenOffice software and Firefox, the open-source browser, instead.

Other authorities are now following Munich's example. Like many cities, the German Foreign Office and the Office for Information Security (BSI) [are dumping M$].... The council's attitude to free software is unambiguous. "We don't mean free in the same sense as free beer", explains Schiessl. He says with Open Source, programmers can improve software and extend it with additional applications, instead of having to rely on a specific company. This benefit carries weight for other city councils as well. Mannheim, Schwäbisch Hall and Treuchtlingen, Bavaria, for example, are relying at least partially, on free software.

Looks like they know what they are doing and did it at the right time. Because Steve Ballmer himself personally offered the city a 90% cut rate, the costs for Munich to move from NT4 to XP were lower than the move to GNU/Linux. That transition would have been finished just in time to move to Vista, Windows 7 and the new Office formats, efforts that have not gone so well at all. Anyone know how Vienna is doing with their move to Vista?"

Debian

Submission + - Richard Stallman says No to Mono. (fsf.org) 4

twitter writes: "There's been a lot of fuss about mono lately. After SCO and M$ suing over FAT patents, you would think avoiding anything M$ would be a matter of common sense. RMS now steps into the fray to warn against a serious mistake.

Debian's decision to include Mono in the default installation, for the sake of Tomboy which is an application written in C#, leads the community in a risky direction. It is dangerous to depend on C#, so we need to discourage its use. .... This is not to say that implementing C# is a bad thing. ... [writing and using applications in mono] is taking a gratuitous risk.

"

Power

Submission + - Intel Redies GNU/Linux Friendly ACPI Replacement (h-online.com) 3

twitter writes: "ACPI was designed to harm free software. Ten years later, ACPI still has problems but has Intel turned over a new leaf? H-Online has an interesting introduction to Simple Firmware Interface.

A few days ago, version 4.0 of the Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) specification was released, weighing in at a hefty 727 pages ... there are still flaws in many implementations.

Intel is now developing the Simple Firmware Interface (SFI) especially for small and low spec devices like Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs) with Atom processors, and is particularly targeting the Linux operating system... SFI can be implemented in addition to, or as an alternative to ACPI, in the firmware either within a classic BIOS, (U)EFI, or with alternative firmware like OpenFirmware.

Version 0.6 has been released as a draft and there is a reference implementation for the 2.6.32 kernel."

Microsoft

Submission + - M$ vrs Netbooks. Dwindling Revenue Fight. (businessweek.com) 1

twitter writes: "As the demand and prices for PCs fall, OEMs struggle to gain independence from the M$ monopoly. Li Chang, vice president of the Taipei Computer Association, complained loud and clear at Computex. Business week has another prime quote in their analysis of this fight:

"It looks like Microsoft [is] paying a lot of attention to their own profitability rather than how to expand the market," says Gianfranco Lanci, chief executive of Acer, the Taiwanese personal computer manufacturer.

The number of PCs sold each year is flattening, and the average selling price is falling fast. That leaves Microsoft, Intel (INTC), Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), and Dell (DELL), which once shared profits from a fast-growing market, fighting harder for every dollar.

Into the mix comes GNU/Linux and the predicted demise of non free software. There's just not enough money in the market to pay for software the non free way. Cooperative sharing in freedom has made software that performs better and costs less. It is impossible for OEMs and retailers to ignore free software on cheaper and better performing platforms. Those that move with demand will survive. Those that think they can cling to 20 year old business models will fail."

Portables

Submission + - The Rise of GNU $150 MIPS and ARM Netbooks. (oreilly.com)

twitter writes: "The promissed sub $200 Netbooks have arrived. Based on MIPS and ARM, these first systems are light and promissing.

technology that once powered supercomputers now is found in embedded devices. In recent years both MIPS32 and MIPS64 cores have been found powering everything from routers to the Sony PlayStation. About a year ago the first MIPS32 based netbooks appeared ... We are talking about systems that reportedly will sell for as little as US $130 and which have already sold for as little as US $149. Say hello to the $150 netbook.

M$ has fought to eliminate this category of computer and failed. Early models reduced their profits and we see what happened to ASUS and Xandros for that. M$ got hardware makers to agree to haredware restrictions in order to sell XP but gave up as hardware makers fought to survive in the downturn. Now they are trying again with Windows 7. Paradoxicly, these restrictions increase the appeal of even lower spec machines which can't run Windows. Other hardware makers will be forced to compete so the category will flourish as $1,500 laptops languish on store shelves."

Internet Explorer

Submission + - IE 8 Consumes 2x RAM as FireFox (blorge.com) 2

twitter writes: "It is hard to imagine Windows 7 fitting on netbooks when IE8 on it's own consumes 400MB of RAM.

a site called "exo.performance.network" conducted the study using a 10-site browsing scenario ... comparing IE8 to IE7, as well as FireFox 3.01 running on two separate machines- Windows XP (SP3) and Vista (SP1). .... IE8 has a 350-400MB memory footprint, uses 150-200 concurrent execution threads, and uses a ridiculous 6 discrete iexplore.exe process instances every time it runs. This means that its well over two times more demanding then FireFox. With older machines, this can mean big problems.

The results were even worse under Vista. Why are people still using IE and Windows?"

Windows

Submission + - US Army Moves to Vista. (army.mil)

twitter writes: "Despite West Point using Windows, "as little as possible," and Vista having been rejected by everyone, the US Army is moving hundreds of thousands of existing Windows desktops to Vista. Even M$ discourages this kind of migration now.

The article's math is contradictory. First they say that 740,000 desktops are involved. Later they say, 44,000 or 13% of the Windows computers have been moved, which gives a total of 340,000. Bad math is unsurprising in news of such bad decision making."

Microsoft

Submission + - Au Charity Backlash to M$ Bait and Switch. (news.idg.no)

twitter writes: "Six months ago, M$ demanded tens of millions of dollars from charities that had bought licenses under "academic discount". The backlash to that move has grown into a real movement with organizations promissing to dump all M$ software if they don't get the discounts they expected.

Australian aged care and charity organisations have sworn to dump the vendor if it enforces the policy change and are prepared to tear out established Microsoft infrastructure to implement open source alternatives. ... [Paula Carleton, CIO of the not-for-profit Baptist Community Services] is investigating how to move its 850 Windows desktops to open source following Microsoft's decision to force it to a full commercial licence, "Every dollar we are forced to spend on software is a dollar less spent on the charitable services like homeless and crisis care that we deliver," St Vincent de Paul Society, National Council of Australia research officer Jonathan Campton said the price increase could not be accomodated into the organisation's budget.

Anglican Church CIO George Lymbers began phasing in open source across his organisation more than a year ago and has slashed more than $250,000 in software costs in combination with a collective bargining agreement.

It is unlikely these charities will get a break while M$ is looking at a 32% decline in earnings and they are better off with free software anyway. Because free software is both cheaper and better, there is little reason for charities to stick with it unless it comes as a turn key system donated. Even then, poor security and stability detract and distract from core objectives or any organization."

It's funny.  Laugh.

Submission + - West Point Maxes Security by Minning Windows.

twitter writes: "Line up, maggots! Uncle Sam is going to keep you away from Windows and honor code violations.

Colonel Joe Adams from the United States Military Academy at West Point has a solution [to your security problems] ... he said recruits at the New York academy line up in the corridors outside their rooms in their barracks every Saturday morning for a notebook inspection or "IT SAMI".

The college teaches Ada ("because you can't cheat at Ada"), C++, Python and Java, he said. And it standardised on FreeBSD: "We love it, it's the key to our success". Col Adams said the college uses Windows "as little as possible".

Did I hear you say Vista?! Drop and give me 20! #@$%!"

Windows

Submission + - M$ Officially Discourages Vista Migrations. (practical-tech.com) 1

twitter writes: "If you are one of the very few companies working on a Vista migration, M$ says it's time to stop and work on Windows 7 instead.

It's official. Bill Veghte, Microsoft's senior VP for Windows business, told an audience of the Microsoft faithful at TechEd that Windows users should not switch to Vista. Veghte said, "If you're just starting your testing of Vista, with the [Windows 7] Release Candidate and the quality of that offering, I would switch over and do your testing on the [Windows 7] Release Candidate, and use that going forward."

This should prove embarrassing enough on the job for your successor to propose a GNU/Linux migration instead. Despite the big noise, Windows 7 is Vista and should be avoided the same way."

Windows

Submission + - Ubuntu Trounces Windows in Google Trends. (junauza.com) 1

twitter writes: "Ubuntu, one of the more popular GNU/Linux distributions, has now attracts more searches than any version of Windows.

You may say that Windows XP is too old thats why its loosing its appeal and is going downhill. So how about we will compare Ubuntu with the fresh Windows Vista or with the upcoming Windows 7.

The graphs tell the story better than I can. Because Ubuntu is only one GNU/Linux distribution, the overall picture is one of free software dominance. Just add GNU/Linux up and you can see what people interested in operating systems are spending their search time with."

Windows

Submission + - M$ Confirms Greedy Windows 7 Home Plans (cnet.com)

twitter writes: "Even as M$ is still paying the price for their Vista Capable and versioning mistakes, Dave Rosenberg thinks the company is about to make a similar mistake with Windows 7. Business Week, always the M$ booster, describes the revenue plan as:

If a consumer on a cheaper PC running the "Standard" version tries to use a high-definition monitor or run more than three software programs at once, he'll discover that neither is possible. Then he'll be prompted to upgrade to the pricier "Home Premium" or "Ultimate" version. [using a credit card and 25 character code]. ... pricing hasn't been determined, but upgrading "will cost less than a night out for four at a pizza restaurant.

I get the idea, because it's a play straight from the early 90s. They get an OEM tax and then hit the customer for software that is less annoying. OEMs that don't do as they are told get taxed harder and M$ pretends they are price competitive with Free Software. Right. Who wants to feed their computer a credit card for basics like the OS and an Office suite when they can have Ubuntu on a netbook that costs less than $400? It did not work for Vista and has even less chance of working now. Corporate users should get their GNU/Linux migration plans in order before M$ collapses."

Microsoft

Submission + - M$ Funds Publisher's Lawsuits Vrs Google Books (wired.com)

twitter writes: "M$'s Plot to Kill Google has taken an ugly turn as M$ is funding opposition to the Google book settlement.

The $125 million deal gives Google the right to store digital copies of the books, include them in its search results, sell online versions and license its book-scans to libraries. It also allows millions of "orphan" works (books still under copyright but whose copyright-holders can't be found) to be included in Google's program.

The only obstacle remaining for the settlement to take effect is final court approval. ... [it is not] surprising that at least one party nudging its way into the settlement is an internet-issues-oriented group from New York Law School. But what does raise an eyebrow is the source of New York Law's funding on this matter: Microsoft.

This is especially interesting given M$'s proven inability to make money with books. The Wired article goes on to expose curious grants to law schools favorable to M$'s positions on various issues. So goes the war on sharing and universal access to knowledge."

Slashdot Top Deals

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...