Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I have an idea (Score 5, Interesting) 165

I never used Mega Video for anything, legit or infringing. I have no opinion of Kim Dotcom. But really, is Dotcom or Ochocinco really worse than "Miller" or "Johnson"? So someone in your history was a miller at some point, now all of his descendants are? Some guy's dad on your history was named John, yay! At least Dotcom and Ochocinco have real personal relevance to those gentlemen. <sarcasm>Anyone with a stupid last name like "smith" should think about changing it to something modern. How many smithies are there in ten people, 0.2? 0.1? Retarded last name.</sarcasm>

Is Kim Dotcom a "douche"? I don't know, I've never met him. Even if he was, though, he still doesn't deserve two government colluding and breaking laws to arrest him. I don't need a third-person written wikipedia article to determine that you, however, are a judgemental prick.

Comment Re:Unfortunately .... (Score 1) 277

I can't speak for the accuracy of his claim that in "other cultures", it's usually a winner take all scenario where one parent walks away and disappears, and the other steps up to raise the kid. But I definitely think there are times when this really is the best outcome for the kid.

As an American living and abiding by one of those "other cultures" let me just say no. NO! NO! NO! Japan is one of those other cultures. There is no concept here of joint custody. A good friend of mine hasn't seen his boys in three years now, despite desperately wanting to. His ex-wife's psycho parents agreed with you that letting him see his children would "confuse" them, thus they told their daughter to move and not tell him where and refuse to divulge the information. He has no legal recourse.

Unless the mother gives up the right or is mentally unfit, custody defaults to the mother here. Despite the fact that my son obviously prefers me more, were I ever to get that divorce that I think of sometimes, I know there's more than a 90% chance that I would never see him again. So I don't want to hear you bitch about your inconvenience that your ex still has some rights that she never exercises anyway and pine for another culture where such a minor inconvenience wouldn't have occurred.

Comment Re:Wealth disparity -- more important than income (Score 1) 555

Think people will play NFL football for $35,000 a year? Not in this lifetime. This is just the stupidest concept you could have possibly brought to an already silly topic.

Considering that people play Arena Football for $400 a game, I think they'd jump at the chance to get paid that much to be on a nationally televised game.

Comment Re:Microsoft cares about privacy (Score 1) 558

That's a very poor analogy. First of all, most curtains are open by default!

I think for that reason my analogy is spot on. DNT closes the curtains, where as tracking would have them open.

What you are saying is, it's totally fine with you for a computer to watch you take a shower and store it on a "secure" server somewhere for the rest of your life + however many years. Also, I never said anything about showers, I said peep into your window at all times. That includes things from the shower (watching pron) and generic sitting on the couch scratching your balls (posting on /.). I don't want anybody collecting data on whether my left side or right side itches more and how that interplays with my desire to eat white bread.

As stated, I would object to that IE message. I wouldn't object to something like:

Some advertisers would like to collect data on you and hold it forever on their servers, and you have no knowledge of what transpires with that information whether it's stolen by hackers or just plain sold. This is all so that you might be bombarded with ads that they think might be pertinent to your interests, but in all most likelihood will be as relevant as generic ads targeted at the site you are on. Do you wish to allow them to data mine you?

Then the default action (so when the user who has just skipped reading the previous message) is to DNT.

As for the complaints of bias, I'm not sure if you are talking about your message or the letter from the ad shills. Your message is biased in favor of tracking (that whole "stuff you're probably not interested in" line makes it biased), while my message is biased against tracking. If you meant the letter from the shills, I would think equating DNT to adblock would be enough evidence of a strong bias.

Last, my analogy already told you why I think it's worse that no DNT by default. It's like buying a new house with the curtains open and some machine recording your every action. Sure you could close the curtains after the fact, but when they're set up funky and you have to jump through hoops to, there'll be more people who don't.

Comment Re:Microsoft cares about privacy (Score 5, Insightful) 558

I just finished reading the letter and found it disgusting. If you took it out of "the internet" and put it in the real world things like

By setting the Internet Explorer browser to block data collection, Microsoft’s action could potentially eliminate the ability to collect web viewing data of up to 43 percent of the browsers used by Americans.

would read more like

By setting the curtains to closed by default, Microsoft’s action could potentially eliminate the ability to peep through windows of up to 43 percent of the houses used by Americans.

To top it off, they have gems like this

A simple example of advertising in the television medium makes this point clear. If consumers were presented a choice of whether they want advertisements on network television to be broadcast, consumers would likely choose “no advertising.” But if 43 percent of American households were removed from the television advertising audience, consumers collectively would suffer because network television as we know it would no longer be a viable business model.

They're acting like MS is installing adblock and turning it on by default. What MS is doing is making the internet more like TV, where the adds are dumb and have to be generally targeted at the type of site, as opposed to creepily personalized.

Comment Re:Good luck finding those pirates though (Score 5, Informative) 286

One big thing about this law is a DMCA-like crack down on circumventing DRM and most Japanese language articles about this talk about it including making copies of movies or CDs that you rent. I didn't go to a rental store today, but it's always been one of my personal pleasures to walk into a movies store and the main display when you walk in is piles of blank CDs and DVDs. The largest chain Tsutaya often doubles as a bookstore with books and magazines teaching you how to rip CDs and DVDs were prominently displayed. I might go down tomorrow to see if it's changed at all. Though when the price of a new CD is generally $30+, it makes a lot of sense that most Japanese people would just rent and rip.

Comment Re:Wow. Really? (Score 1) 294

This. This is the post I was going to make when I first read this article. What happens when some zombienet decides it doesn't like a site? Say I've got a phishing site and I blast the real site into oblivion while my site goes up. I saw let's beat them to it and just spam the fuck out if *AA sites. Here's the link. Let's have at it: http://support.google.com/bin/static.py?hl=en&ts=1114905&page=ts.cs

Comment Re:That is no prediction (Score 1) 291

That line of thinking was invalidated by WWII... how?

Do you mean the part where the US came in after the Soviets had won the war in Europe and declared itself the winner?

Or the part where the US took on an opponent that could barely challenge them... and used nuclear weapons in a war already practically won?

Americans contributed very little to the defeat of the Axis. Most of the fall of the Axis can be attributed to the Nazi military leaders being just plain incompetent. And of course, the Soviet Union, to provide the iceberg for Nazi Germany to ram into.

I weep for the US education system...

Japan

Submission + - Japan criminalizes downloading pirated content (japan-press.co.jp)

shoemilk writes: On June 15th, with an overwhelming majority, the Japanese Diet passed a law criminalizing ripping DVDs, and updated an existing law criminalizing downloading pirated materials. Starting in January of 2010, downloading pirated content was made illegal but without a stated punishment. This law has been updated to set a penalty of up to 2 years in jail or up to 20 million yen. (Link to Japanese article http://japan.cnet.com/news/business/35018227/)

Comment Re:Who's the parasite? (Score 1) 2416

Hello Thank you for checking in. I'm always curious to see how it's going in the bizarro world of Forever Now. Good to know nothing has changed since last time, nor the time before that, or before that, or before that, or before that. In the world of Forever Now, "insurance" is a scam and everyone knows it because nothing bad ever happens because nothing ever changes. Fire extinguishers? Non existent! Why should they? No one will ever use them. Waste of money!

Seriously, are you that short-sighted or just that stupid? Ever sick person was once "young and healthy".

Slashdot Top Deals

A failure will not appear until a unit has passed final inspection.

Working...