First, what counts as plagiarism is whatever the institution decides and the employee agreed to.
But I think Harvard's rule is so strict, when it comes to non-fiction, that I think it slows down science. A fact should be allowed to be repeated verbatim, because attempts to paraphrase said fact inevitably change its meaning.
Twitter’s slide into irrelevance and extremism as it decays into X has hastened the explosive growth of a whole host of newer social networks.
The death of Twitter is greatly exaggerated. While revenue is down to 2014 levels, the number of annual users is growing steadily upward (aside from a plateau 2015-2020). https://www.businessofapps.com/data/twitter-statistics/
That is Kurzweil's solution. His 2017 DVD set Singularity, which describes it, is oddly not listed at Amazon, but it is available on ebay https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=singularity+dvd+2017.
The idea has merit, and it may even be the best idea, but I don't think it will prove sufficient. I'm an AI Doomer. Here's my 11-minute explanation on why from 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk-0nu4fg1w.
The flush toilet is the basis of Western civilization. -- Alan Coult