How are you to prove to your employer/big brother that you don't have one?

ToasterMonkey Questioned?

To which you responded:

You have not explained why it is unethical. The post you replied to asked for clarification as to why the parent thought it was unethical to help set up a call center in another country.

You assert that "outsourcing will but[sic] us in the ass and had already lowered quality of products and services worldwide." Can you offer some support for this premise? In a related note you seem to blame outsourcing or globalization for the "disappearing of the middle class", again I am disinclined to accept this premise without support.

Your discussion of price, dollar, and the thought patterns of "business people" is a complete non sequitur, as is your opening statements relative to assumptions about the parent posters age.

I believe you may have point for discusion, but as it stands it is poorly articulated and not well supported by anything other than your assertions.

Indeed. I meant to say

"1/3 has no exact decimal representation."

Of course meaning no exact representation as a decimal fraction

Clearly 1/3 itself is, also, an exact representation.

Sure, I have some troll biscuits in my pocket that I'd like to get rid of.

What is 1/3 as a decimal?

If it has a decimal representation at all, then it is .333...

That is to say that it is a decimal point followed by an infinite
number of 3s.

So what is .333... * 3?

Of course it's .999...
which implies .999 followed by an infinite number of 9s. As you say:

But .333... is equal to 1/3.

1/3 * 3 = 1

Thus, .333... * 3 = .999... = 1

QED

I find the notion of repeating decimals kind of silly, and would just
prefer to say that 1/3 has no exact representation. As far as I can
tell from calculus class this doesn't change anything.

This is just a thought, and IANAL so I could be completely wrong here.

What if the organization, eg CorpInc, took software released under the GPL and made modifications to it. Then they installed the modified versions to their own computers. The modified version is clearly under the GPL, because it is a derivative work. However is CorpInc required to give it's employees that use those computers the source to the modified version? If they are, then by the terms of the GPL the employees can give the source, and binaries, to others.

While it may not matter where the doctor is physically located, I am sure it matters where the doctor is licensed. I doubt the Texas Board of Medicine, or any other state board, will license many doctors in a 'doctor center' in India.

That information is contained in confidential ethics documents.

There must be at least a dozen ways to avoid/reduce piracy without violating user privacy and not using this DRM crap.

Could you suggest one or two then?

The entire page is copyrighted by Wolfram. Compare with this example:

It may not surprise you that the line of perl code
print "Hello, world!\n";
"prints the message Hello, world!"(Swhartz & Phoenix, 2001) And the fact that it appears in a book, the text of which is copyrighted by O'Reilly Media, Inc. Which reserves all rights to the work should not surprise you either.

Schwartz, Randal L., & Phoenix, Tom. (2001). Learning Perl (3rd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.

I hate to be pedantic, but my therapist says I should accept myself for who i am.

He did say

700 coffee incidents is what percent of McDonalds' total coffee sales?

Emphasis mine

Because the majority of crash-inducing bugs don't result in security vulnerabilities, there can be a fair amount of internal debate when they're discovered during development.

a repeatable tool that takes a look at a crash

Both of the above quotes indicate that the tool does not determine when a program will crash. It only analysis the crash after a tester/developer has found a bug that makes the program crash.

This is not the halting problem, but a more ambiguous problem of weather a specific crash inducing bug is a security risk, or just a bug.

While the above post may be "Interesting" to some, it is a blatant example of a Tu Quoque Fallacy. Ignoring that the GP did not seek to praise the US government for its actions, the US government's involvement in any software production is not relevant.

If they are 'hard to find' why do you say 'It won't be long before we are seeing them.' ?

Yes.

But you wouldn't think everyone would catch on...

We shall honor the dead how we wish.

Perhaps you need to lighten the fuck up.

Lame and rude? Like she cares now.

Do you seriously think she wouldn't laugh at these jokes, if she were here?

If that is the case, then I am glad she is gone. Those that can't laugh at themselves are the poorest souls, and life in it's wonder is lost on them; death is better.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlBiLNN1NhQ&feature=channel