Except for all being done by idiots, who apparently can't learn the meaning of the word "prediction".

And where would that be?

Look up the history of the Sahara

I agree. Given the problems in the Panama Canal, an ice-free Arctic Ocean would be a HUGE boon to shipping across the top of the world.

Added a "User Space" slashbox to my side bar with the code for My Messages

Write In Journal

Given the banking industry's history of racial bias, I sure hope somebody's looking out for the 3/4ths folks. Depending on what they're ingesting for source material into the large language model, redlining could come back by accident fairly easily.

They see themselves as the agent of God's wrath. Which is a good thing, because the one thing you can count on theocracies to do is tell you the rules ahead of time (unlike atheist regimes, that change the rules from day to day and then put you in a work gulag for not knowing the rules).

I think weight, in this case, refers to number of stored and fully vectorized tokens.

The Nubians, who were pushed upstream. But not before the new Egyptians learned how to build pyramids from them.

God is Gravity! And what better preschool example of gravity do we have, than how liquid flows downhill!

It's a well established human tradition.

9000 years ago as the Sahara dried up, all the humans moved to the Nile Valley.

Um.. no. The resources needed to feed a large language model are available in the Internet Archive. If you limit it to websites that have not been online in the last 10 years, you won't even have to worry about copyright.

Yep- so Europe freezes- humanity has been dying there for ages. We'll just shift to other continents.

Is the answer. Hydroponic roofs, green walls, can reduce energy usage (due to increased insulation of the plants themselves), make growing food more local (grow the food where the people are, instead of trucking from many miles away) and actually look better than traditional landscaping around brutalist architecture.

From the point of view of the peer-review industrial complex of publishers, who can't stand their methods being questioned (or their insane "publication fees" being questioned).

The problem is that there *is* significant evidence to back up the claims that the data was manipulated. Whether or not this led to an incorrect conclusion is in doubt, but real world data contains more noise than that.