There's a "lite" version (also v2).

Do you both have rights to them? That's the whole point of the question: who "owns" the intentionally-shared "mutually"-created data?

And all those family photos on the media server connected to the TV...?

This implies that your spouse is OK with the idea of making these backups in the case of potential divorce.

Implying that it could/might happen is dangerous, my friend.

Because you're both in all of those photos? Some of these things (like social media data) make sense. Others (like email)... not so much.

Profiling is only bad if it disproportionately targets particular groups or labels.

Shahidka are a vast minority of modern-day terrorists. That, plus there have been no reports or confirmed shahidka terrorist activities in the USA.

No, it requires parents to understand every game they are buying. They don't need to know every game out there - just the ones that they're willing to buy and hand to their children....

Agreed 100%. Statistically speaking, the best approach is to only scan men, as the vast majority of (current) terrorists are male, and the available pool of potential future women recruits is (currently) smaller.

Is it too crazy to expect that sampling for security should match the actual observed distribution (with a uniform prior)?

Is this a bad thing? I mean, romanticize how you will, but is it really better to put human (or even robot) footprints on Mars than to push the telescope programs? 225,000,000 km or 2.25 x 10^20 km - we can't live there (yet).

Had to go with "housing" on this one.

After all, there are only so many video games one person can buy....

Paying twice as much now and the same later sounds better than normal now and 10x later.

You are going to be one of the few not screwed when the dinosaurs start running out. And they'll be closing those dirty plants down the way when coal is more expensive than gold. Isn't this still a good outcome long-term, even if it costs now?

Radiation bites Phobos Grunt.
Radiation bites Phobos Grunt.
Phobos Grunt dies.

Better to get them with the knife, in CoD. Shotguns will paint you on enemy radar, besides being more effective at clue-ing in anyone nearby that there is trouble lurking around.

Can't resist.

The distribution of a single sample is not statistically required to reflect the full distribution; the probability of that particular sample goes down, but never equals zero. This is why anecdotes get so much distrust.

That said, I currently have an "additional screening" rate of greater than 90% in the US, while my wife is never selected. I have to wonder if things would be different, were there more prominent female terrorists.