At the most extreme disjoint of the two sets, that means that 50% of people believe that letting a car drive their children to school would put them at higher risk, and yet they'd do it anyway for money.

Yeah but a car that could self evacuate from a cyclone would certainly lower premiums by a lot more than 80%.

If car auto-pilot is like auto-correct, we're all going to die in really funny ways. No matter what the results of this survey say.

That is the purpose of pumping gas back in to the big ass-hole

Nor is it clear why nearby oil fields that have also been injected with CO2 have not experienced similar seismic activity.

Until you figure out why CO2 injection causes problems at one oilfield, and not its neighbors, even though all of them have had similar amounts of CO2 injected, it seems rather more likely than not that the CO2 injection had nothing to do with the tremors.

If you bought a copy, found iout ater it had huge problems and a pirate copy is the only way to get a usable product, then go for it. You bought it and can do what you want. But that's totally different than pirating it from the get go simply because it has DRM and you don't like that.

They didn't pull out of Steam over any sort of philosophical disagreement, they did it because they wanted all of the pie.

It depends on the alternate viewpoints? Some topics don't have much in the way of alternate viewpoints. There isn't "common" ground on a lot of topics it either is or it is not.

This begs the question of why someone would want to get alternative viewpoints. Most people don't want to be regularly exposed to ideas, beliefs, culture, etc., that conflicts with their own. It creates anxiety, anger, and/or dissociation.