Wasn't that supposedly one of the main reasons that they bought BEA - to get Weblogic to merge with/replace OAS?

Er, which "cheek" do you mean?

Just say "414" and waggle your eyebrows suggestively ...

Oops, try that again with a real list (and a slight rewrite) ...

No, it's not that at all. All they're trying to claim is that you can't sue them for copyright infringement for storing your content after you delete your account - i.e. it's more

1. Write your content on Facebook.
2. Delete Facebook account.
3. Publish dead-tree book of your content.
4. Realise Facebook still has your content available to users (e.g. if you mailed it to your BFF).
5. Sue Facebook for copyright infringement.
6. Facebook tell you to get stuffed, because you agreed to licence it to them.

There's more of an issue when 4 is replaced by the following:

4a. Facebook publish a "best of Facebook posts" book, containing your content.

No, it's not that at all. All they're trying to claim is that you can't sue them for copyright infringement for storing your content after you delete your account - i.e. it's more 1. Write your content on Facebook. 2. Delete Facebook account. 3. Publish dead-tree book of your content. 4. Realise Facebook still has your content available to users (e.g. if you mailed it to your BFF). 5. Sue Facebook for copyright infringement. 6. Facebook tell you to get stuffed, because you agreed to licence it to them. The issue might more be what happens when 4 is replaced by the following: 4a. Facebook publish a "best of Facebook posts" book, containing your content.