Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Tried to Sign Up, Already Frustrated (Score 1) 644

The site is also less secure for me because none of my standard, extremely secure, never before had a problem with them passwords will work for it. That will force me to write it down, making the site inherently less secure.

If you're reusing passwords, it's not secure.

When sites come up with new, unusual standards for usernames and passwords (e.g. must contain a %, *, or ^), then they are making the site less secure because they are increasing the odds that people will have to write down their usernames and passwords.

They will, and it will be far more secure than using "my5tr0ngP@$$w0rd!" that you reuse on other sites.

Comment Re:Good Lord Stop Teasing Me! (Score 1) 183

They fly everywhere I do and ignore the FAA rule? Seriously?

Emirates have an amazing network, if you're happy to change once you can get from pretty much anywhere in the world to anywhere else. Nairobi to Berlin? Tokyo to Manchester? Sydney to Delhi?

Emirates couldn't give a stuff why the FAA say, just like delta couldn't care less about what the CAA says.

Light must bend when it passes your skull. So you are under the impression that the whole freaking universe flies Nairobi to Berlin? Tokyo to Manchester? Sydney to Delhi? Guess again Einstein, There is an entire world that does not share your San Francisco practicality. So here is another suggestion, let airlines provide the services that they want to provide and compete on that basis.

Err, those are examples. And EK do fly San Francisco to Dubai too, which allows connections to that part of the world.

I believe Virgin (UK), Ryanair (Ireland), Qantas (Austrailia) and Qatar (Qatar) all offer, or offered, in flight mobiles too, at least on some planes, and I know the last TAP (Portugal) flight I was on offered it. The fact others haven't tells me that the commercial demand just isn't there, but on the whole there's no global problem with carriers offering it.

No doubt you'll come up with some obscure example like "I want to fly from Hicksville to Bogata on a Star Alliance carrier and they don't offer it unless I choose a seat near the front but I prefer to be behind the wing as I get a better view".

Comment Re:Doom 4 (Score 4, Funny) 154

I wonder if Doom 4 will ever see the daylight. Apparently the game has been considered being in a "development hell" for some time and Todd and John bailing out probably won't make things any better.

You know what game deserved a sequel? Duke Nukem 3D

Comment Re:Good Lord Stop Teasing Me! (Score 1) 183

They fly everywhere I do and ignore the FAA rule? Seriously?

Emirates have an amazing network, if you're happy to change once you can get from pretty much anywhere in the world to anywhere else. Nairobi to Berlin? Tokyo to Manchester? Sydney to Delhi?

Emirates couldn't give a stuff why the FAA say, just like delta couldn't care less about what the CAA says.

Comment Re:Getting a signal to the ground (Score 1) 183

>Airlines would have to install equipment in their planes that would communicate with cellphone towers on the ground.

How those people aboard the doomed aircraft on Sept 11 were all able to make phone calls again?

By flying low. I rarely get a signal above 10k foot, and have never managed to get one above 20k foot.

Comment Re:NO! (Score 1) 183

There's *no* reason for using a cell phone on a plane.

Citation needed.

Here's a reason: I want to phone home and talk to my wife and child
Here's another reason: I want to join a conference call, which is tricky enough to arrange in the first place with people in the States, Europe and Asia all on it.

Comment Re:I see $$$ signs! (Score 1) 183

Airlines will love this. Even at $1/minute, passengers will rake up pretty good bills by the end of the flight. And I doubt they will stop at a buck a minute, because above 10k feet, well, they got you by the balls.

Many airlines already have phones installed in the backs of seats that passengers can use, and have for some time now. You pay for them by credit card. In the countless times I have flown I have yet to see someone actually use them. I can assure you the airlines have not been raking in the money with that.

Well I have used them, they're fine for a quick call, but they're hard to hear over the low quality and loud engines.

BA have phased them out on the new planes, and turned them off about a year ago on the old planes.

But then I remember flying back in 2008 on TAP when in flight mobiles were allowed. The problem wasn't people talking, it was the teenagers who didn't know how to put their text message tone on "silent"

Comment Re:I see $$$ signs! (Score 1) 183

Airlines will love this. Even at $1/minute, passengers will rake up pretty good bills by the end of the flight. And I doubt they will stop at a buck a minute, because above 10k feet, well, they got you by the balls.

Actually I wouldn't be surprised if the airline mafia were behind this, with large paychecks for the FCC officials who push this through.

I don't know about US plans, but typical intercontinental roaming rates for UK phone contracts are well above $2 a minute, nearer $3.

Comment Re:Why again is BP still in business? (Score 2) 263

They were an attack from the British. They're not an American company. How would the US government ever stop the British from doing whatever the hell they want to us? Your post makes no damn sense. It's like you don't know that they're two different countries. They are British Petroleum. Why lie and say they are not? Please. Just. Stop.

As of 2012, 38% of BP shares were held by American investors, 36% by British investors, and 14% by the rest of Europe with the remaining shares held by investors from other countries.

Comment Re:Only BP? (Score 1) 263

Here in slashdot every time Microsoft is bashed or we talk about Windows Phones, either we are modded down or people say that piece of turd that is Windows mobile is better than iPad. So it is not only BP that hires trolls.

I'd rather use a windows phone to make a phone call than an ipad, but I'm quite unusual in that I dial phone numbers.

Comment Re:Go west from the South Pole??? (Score 1) 132

Antactica != South pole

Well yes, but his point stands.

We call it Western Antarctica as it's longitude is west of an arbitrary point.

Where the west coast of europe, or america, or austrailia, or the atlantic, or the pacific, are easily spotted on a globe if you know "north" is the hemisphere with most land, choosing "West" on a continent that encircles the globe is arbitrary. If the Meridian was where the dateline is, "western" antarctica would be what we call "Eastern Antarctica"

Slashdot Top Deals

"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde

Working...